ADVERTISEMENT

Genesis of Soros gaslighting

anon_xl72qcu5isp39

Heisman Candidate
Sep 7, 2008
11,031
4,355
113
As many of you know, I have long maintained that over 1/2 of conservative talking points are simply Rove/Roy Cohn style lies that mirror your opponent's criticisms. Ol' Abe Lincoln noted this tactic and we trial lawyers use his quote from time to time when corporate defense lawyers employ the same trick.

Conservatives are having tiki torch rallies, white supremacists, blacks hate GOP, D. Duke enthusiastic republican? Libs are racist!

Every conservative and their dog wants Obama to fail and openly sabotages health care to embarrass Obama? Dems want the U.S. to fail.

Cons consistently resist expansions of personal rights, e.g. gay marriage and weed legalization? Demand conformity with songs and pledges of loyalty? Libs are the authoritarians.

I have never seen more feeble-minded mass accept messaging like the Soros deal. The real reason he's been so demonized through the years is to distract and deflect from the influence of the most shitty, greedy, selfish, royalist, elitist, dickheads in the history of our republic: The Koch brothers. Soros hasn't done a fraction of their shenanigans. Most of the wingnut opinions on here were formed by the Kochs, and were rightfully deemed fringe wingnuts by Reagan, Buckley, et al.

Nearly forty years later, many of the Kochs’ policy preferences are now standard Republican orthodoxy, having been promoted from the fringes into the mainstream by the dozens of nonprofit organizations and candidates they funded. Small government, anti-tax, anti-regulatory, and pro-privatization policies, as well as skepticism regarding global warming, are commonplace.
 
Yes, yes, “conservatives” are evil and plotting against you personally right now while liberals are blameless holy creatures standing against the evils and horrors wrought by conservatives.

Honestly, the Koch’s are rich weirdos that try to push their political beliefs domestically while Soros is a rich weirdo that tries to push his political beliefs globally.
 
Yes, yes, “conservatives” are evil and plotting against you personally right now while liberals are blameless holy creatures standing against the evils and horrors wrought by conservatives.

LOL have you heard conservative media at any point in the last 20 years?
 
LOL have you heard conservative media at any point in the last 20 years?

Yes. And also the liberal media....which sounds the same, but with the roles reversed.

The difference is that you only listen to your side and buy into it hook, line, and sinker without thinking “maybe these dolts are just BSing for viewers/subscribers/votes?”
 
Yes. And also the liberal media....which sounds the same, but with the roles reversed.

The difference is that you only listen to your side and buy into it hook, line, and sinker without thinking “maybe these dolts are just BSing for viewers/subscribers/votes?”

I gave examples of mirroring in the first post. You leapfrog over that and default to generalizations. If prominent libs have done the same thing please produce it. I'll go refresh this coffee and check back in.
 

Well, you saw the objective numbers of how his candidacy ended. I wouldn't call that widespread endorsement of his platform.

Easy to say that and know what it means when people traveled on horses, and there were no airplanes, highways, computers, etc? Where has their approach worked out well in the real, contemporary world over the long haul?
 
As many of you know, I have long maintained that over 1/2 of conservative talking points are simply Rove/Roy Cohn style lies that mirror your opponent's criticisms. Ol' Abe Lincoln noted this tactic and we trial lawyers use his quote from time to time when corporate defense lawyers employ the same trick.

Conservatives are having tiki torch rallies, white supremacists, blacks hate GOP, D. Duke enthusiastic republican? Libs are racist!

Every conservative and their dog wants Obama to fail and openly sabotages health care to embarrass Obama? Dems want the U.S. to fail.

Cons consistently resist expansions of personal rights, e.g. gay marriage and weed legalization? Demand conformity with songs and pledges of loyalty? Libs are the authoritarians.

I have never seen more feeble-minded mass accept messaging like the Soros deal. The real reason he's been so demonized through the years is to distract and deflect from the influence of the most shitty, greedy, selfish, royalist, elitist, dickheads in the history of our republic: The Koch brothers. Soros hasn't done a fraction of their shenanigans. Most of the wingnut opinions on here were formed by the Kochs, and were rightfully deemed fringe wingnuts by Reagan, Buckley, et al.

Nearly forty years later, many of the Kochs’ policy preferences are now standard Republican orthodoxy, having been promoted from the fringes into the mainstream by the dozens of nonprofit organizations and candidates they funded. Small government, anti-tax, anti-regulatory, and pro-privatization policies, as well as skepticism regarding global warming, are commonplace.

 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Yes, yes, “conservatives” are evil and plotting against you personally right now while liberals are blameless holy creatures standing against the evils and horrors wrought by conservatives.

Honestly, the Koch’s are rich weirdos that try to push their political beliefs domestically while Soros is a rich weirdo that tries to push his political beliefs globally.

Remember, @syskatine doesnt categorize people.
 
I gave examples of mirroring in the first post. You leapfrog over that and default to generalizations. If prominent libs have done the same thing please produce it. I'll go refresh this coffee and check back in.

You mirror in this and nearly every post of your career. It would be hard not to find examples of leftist mirroring by you in particular for starters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrunkenViking
You mirror in this and nearly every post of your career. It would be hard not to find examples of leftist mirroring by you in particular for starters.

The blind spot with sys, the anger, the condemnation, the labeling, the condemnation. The parroting, the condemnation. He is a simple minded creature with an above average passion.

He is fluffing his feathers on several subjects this morning, but it’s no different than listening to cnn. Self awareness is extinct on the left and frankly it’s part of the mental illness that has brought us trans track meets and 150 genders and climate change meetings with private jets. They just don’t see themselves anymore.

Our side can rail on republicans, religious zealots, terrible at legislating, hypocrites, and just spineless weenies in the faces of their counterparts, but he can’t see that either. He thinks we’re are the same as him. That’s all the left’s problem that they can’t see the projection. It’s fascinating and frightening.
 
Remember, @syskatine doesnt categorize people.

Oh like hell I don't. First, there's a difference between categorizing people and demanding a law that categorizes people. Second, as I said in that thread, I took the devil's advocate. I know the moral weight and clarity of my writings resonate like law, but it was just me.
 
Conservatives are having tiki torch rallies, white supremacists, blacks hate GOP, D. Duke enthusiastic republican? Libs are racist!



Cons consistently resist expansions of personal rights, e.g. gay marriage and weed legalization? Demand conformity with songs and pledges of loyalty? Libs are the authoritarians.

Huh, speaking of demanding conformity


Ever heard of SJW’s?

My goodness man, open your eyes
 
Well, you saw the objective numbers of how his candidacy ended. I wouldn't call that widespread endorsement of his platform.

Easy to say that and know what it means when people traveled on horses, and there were no airplanes, highways, computers, etc? Where has their approach worked out well in the real, contemporary world over the long haul?
I don't know what objective numbers you are referencing, and I'm not sure who he is when referring to "his" candidacy or platform is. Perhaps the article gave the perspective, but I didn't read it. Only saw the revisionist history statement in your post. Sure, government needs to be bigger now than in the 1700s, but doesn't mean that it needs to be so big as that created by the New Deal, implementing Keynesian ideas, Obamacare, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CBradSmith
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT