ADVERTISEMENT

Former Secret Service Agent: VP Biden Engaged in Weinstein-Level Groping

Here's Creepy Uncle Joe trying to get handsy with Jeff Sessions' granddaughter at a swearing-in ceremony. Sessions pushes his hand away. All of Washington must know of Biden's pedophilia.

 
don't think that was what he was doing....
 
All of D.C. has known for years about the Bidens and Hasterts in their midst. They even promote them up the political ladder.
Here's a bunch more of Creepy Uncle Joe. Seriously, who does this, besides Creepy Joe? Someone needs to sing a rendition of Cotton Eye Joe with "Pedophile Joe" instead and put it as the music score of one of these videos.

 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
I'v redone the lyrics. @MegaPoke, maybe your band should record this.


If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
[x6]

He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to Hell, broken, sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men 'cause of Pedophile Joe

If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
[x2]

He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to Hell, broken, sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men 'cause of Pedophile Joe

If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
 
I'v redone the lyrics. @MegaPoke, maybe your band should record this.


If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
[x6]

He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to Hell, broken, sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men 'cause of Pedophile Joe

If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
[x2]

He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to Hell, broken, sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men 'cause of Pedophile Joe

If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
That should be recorded. It would go viral.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
I'v redone the lyrics. @MegaPoke, maybe your band should record this.


If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
[x6]

He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to Hell, broken, sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men 'cause of Pedophile Joe

If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?
[x2]

He brought disaster wherever he went
The hearts of the girls was to Hell, broken, sent
They all ran away so nobody would know
And left only men 'cause of Pedophile Joe

If it hadn't been for Pedophile Joe
I'd been married a long time ago
Where did you come from, where did you go?
Where did you come from, Pedophile Joe?

Great one!! I didn't rewrite shit, but Pedo-Joe needs to add this one to his campaign "touch-fest":

 
Here's a bunch more of Creepy Uncle Joe. Seriously, who does this, besides Creepy Joe? Someone needs to sing a rendition of Cotton Eye Joe with "Pedophile Joe" instead and put it as the music score of one of these videos.

He is ****ing sick and the libs on this board appear to accept his behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
Real pedos thrive in Washington. They are elevated to vice-president and speaker of the house and they get filthy rich during their careers there.
Doesn’t matter as long as their team wins, am I right?
 

That's creepy.

Tough to put him in the same league as a Hastert, but it's over the line, imo. He's been getting old and a little more crazy and it's time to gracefully exit stage left.

I'm sure it's a pure coincidence that this is all coming up in reponse to Moore's issues. Beauregard didn't swat his hand away, who knows the spin in the rest of it, but let me be the first to say he can't sniff and sugar on girls like that. It looked like he was gonna lay his dong over her shoulder.
 
I'm sure it's a pure coincidence that this is all coming up in reponse to Moore's issues.
The concept is quite simple. Despite your longing to make pedophilia a partisan issue, it isn't. Unfortunately, pedophilia can be found in the members of any political party, race, sex, nationality, country, religion (or lack thereof), socioeconomic status, etc.
 
The concept is quite simple. Despite your longing to make pedophilia a partisan issue, it isn't. Unfortunately, pedophilia can be found in the members of any political party, race, sex, nationality, country, religion (or lack thereof), socioeconomic status, etc.

It also includes religious prophets (Mohammad married a girl under 10 named Aisha).



And modern nations -- the age of consent in Mexico is 12.


Source: https://www.unicef.org/rightsite/433_457.htm
 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
The concept is quite simple. Despite your longing to make pedophilia a partisan issue, it isn't. Unfortunately, pedophilia can be found in the members of any political party, race, sex, nationality, country, religion (or lack thereof), socioeconomic status, etc.

While I agree wholeheartedly with what you are saying, we do have someone asserting that Moore’s actions are more an issue with changing moral values over the past 40 years than pedophilia/ebophilia.

Probably why Sys mentioned that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
While I agree wholeheartedly with what you are saying, we do have someone asserting that Moore’s actions are more an issue with changing moral values over the past 40 years than pedophilia/ebophilia.

Probably why Sys mentioned that.

My statement was only in regards to the 30-year old dating 17 and 18 year old high schoolers, which Roy Moore actually owned up to. I'm waiting for any shred of veracity of the reports of him molesting the 14 year old.
 
The concept is quite simple. Despite your longing to make pedophilia a partisan issue, it isn't. Unfortunately, pedophilia can be found in the members of any political party, race, sex, nationality, country, religion (or lack thereof), socioeconomic status, etc.

Partisan? Eh. Remarkable pattern among sanctimonious men that use conservative mores to advance politically? Yeah.
 
we do have someone asserting that Moore’s actions are more an issue with changing moral values over the past 40 years than pedophilia/ebophilia.
On this board? I haven't seen anything suggesting changing moral values posted by anyone on here. Admittedly, I probably haven't read every post regarding Roy Moore and I do have one poster on ignore. If you're referring to other politicians or media talking heads, par for the course on just about any disgusting and slimy issue. Just look at the recent spectacle of all of the molestation and harassment allegations. I took syskatine's post to be regarding this board.

Partisan? Eh. Remarkable pattern among sanctimonious men that use conservative mores to advance politically? Yeah.
You might be believable if you didn't have a long history of "why do they vote for these people." Just sayin.
 
My statement was only in regards to the 30-year old dating 17 and 18 year old high schoolers, which Roy Moore actually owned up to. I'm waiting for any shred of veracity of the reports of him molesting the 14 year old.

Like you are waiting for any shred of veracity to this thread?
 
My statement was only in regards to the 30-year old dating 17 and 18 year old high schoolers, which Roy Moore actually owned up to. I'm waiting for any shred of veracity of the reports of him molesting the 14 year old.

What has he actually owned up to in your understanding? It’s my understanding that he has denied all of it and hasn’t owned up to anything.

On this board? I haven't seen anything suggesting changing moral values posted by anyone on here. Admittedly, I probably haven't read every post regarding Roy Moore and I do have one poster on ignore. If you're referring to other politicians or media talking heads, par for the course on just about any disgusting and slimy issue. Just look at the recent spectacle of all of the molestation and harassment allegations. I took syskatine's post to be regarding this board.


You might be believable if you didn't have a long history of "why do they vote for these people." Just sayin.

And your claim that you were only referring to 17 or 18 heard olds dating 30 year olds isn’t really reflected in what you actually said.

No one cares about the legal ramifications of what someone did 40 years ago. My challenge in all this is trying to separate what I consider real harassment, such as Weinstein, who has direct influence into whether or not actresses have success in their careers vs. the changing of our moral code over 40 years. I remember high school and knew several 'girls' who dated older men (in their 20s and 30s). It was accepted. Frowned upon? Yes. But ignored and not exactly relevant 40 years later. But if we are going to judge every action to today's standards, shouldn't we be throwing Bill Clinton under the bus? He was in the ultimate position of power relative to any of his staff or interns. Whether or not Monica (or others) was consensual, it was by today's definition sexual harassment.

Don’t you think using his position as DA at the time to warn women off from complaining or to convince them to date him constituted sexual harassment every bit as much as Monica and Slick Willie?

I personally don’t need evidence of a pattern of practice sufficient to convict a politician in a court of law to decide for myself that he is someone that I find personally repugnant and not someone I want in Congress.

I didn’t buy the “vast right wing conspiracy” statement by Hillary when Bill was having his issues, and I don’t buy the “vast uniparty establishment conspiracy” noise Moore is making either.
 
The concept is quite simple. Despite your longing to make pedophilia a partisan issue, it isn't. Unfortunately, pedophilia can be found in the members of any political party, race, sex, nationality, country, religion (or lack thereof), socioeconomic status, etc.
I agree completely with this but I will say that as far as media coverage it gets a lot more attention when someone who is considered conservative or right wing or Christian and is mostly ignored when they are liberal or left wing or Islamic. (I'm still trying to figure out the lefts embrace of Islam. One of the few times I agree with Bill Maher.)

I want them all to be exposed and punished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alpha Poke
What has he actually owned up to in your understanding? It’s my understanding that he has denied all of it and hasn’t owned up to anything.

He stated that he dated 3 of the original women while they were 'teenagers' (17 & 18). He even got parental consent. In fact, one of the women stated that her mother highlighted that he's the type of guy she would want to see her daughter with.


And your claim that you were only referring to 17 or 18 heard olds dating 30 year olds isn’t really reflected in what you actually said.

I'll try to spell things out more specifically. But when the news broke on Miller, this had been his only crime, that he dated 'teenagers' as a 30 year-old. It was 3 or 4 days later when the 5th person came out and claimed the actual molestation/rape charges while she was a 14 year old, which he has vehemently denied.

Don’t you think using his position as DA at the time to warn women off from complaining or to convince them to date him constituted sexual harassment every bit as much as Monica and Slick Willie?

I would, but has he been the DA for the past 40 years? I'm sorry I'm cynical, but I don't give strong credibility to such strong claims when they occurred 40 years ago.

I personally don’t need evidence of a pattern of practice sufficient to convict a politician in a court of law to decide for myself that he is someone that I find personally repugnant and not someone I want in Congress.

In other words, if the crime is bad enough and he plays for the other team, then there should be no presumption of innocence for those who deny the charges.

I didn’t buy the “vast right wing conspiracy” statement by Hillary when Bill was having his issues, and I don’t buy the “vast uniparty establishment conspiracy” noise Moore is making either.

I don't believe its a uni-party conspiracy and have never claimed as much. And he very well may have committed the crimes as accused. But you can't tell me that that sliver of cynic inside you doesn't wonder why such serious charges took 40+ years to come to light. And then when the victim goes and hires the most high profile, money grubbing lawyer available (Gloria Alread or whatever her name is), that your cynic bone (if you have one) doesn't start wondering if this is just a fame & money grab.
 
He stated that he dated 3 of the original women while they were 'teenagers' (17 & 18). He even got parental consent. In fact, one of the women stated that her mother highlighted that he's the type of guy she would want to see her daughter with.




I'll try to spell things out more specifically. But when the news broke on Miller, this had been his only crime, that he dated 'teenagers' as a 30 year-old. It was 3 or 4 days later when the 5th person came out and claimed the actual molestation/rape charges while she was a 14 year old, which he has vehemently denied.

Fair enough.

I would, but has he been the DA for the past 40 years? I'm sorry I'm cynical, but I don't give strong credibility to such strong claims when they occurred 40 years ago.

Above you say he has admitted to dating these teenagers when he was thirty. He was a district attorney from 77-82. He was born in 47. He was DA when he was 30. “Consensual” or not, the situation is remarkably similar to Bill and Monica even on the things he has admitted.

In other words, if the crime is bad enough and he plays for the other team, then there should be no presumption of innocence for those who deny the charges.

Nope. In other words, I didn’t need proof beyond a reasonable doubt (the standard for criminal prosecution) before deciding someone was a harasser that should be ashamed, reviled, and/or not voted into office when it came to Clinton, Weinstein, O’Reilly, Cosby and others. I’m not the one with a varying standard of required proof based upon the person or when it happened.


I don't believe its a uni-party conspiracy and have never claimed as much. And he very well may have committed the crimes as accused. But you can't tell me that that sliver of cynic inside you doesn't wonder why such serious charges took 40+ years to come to light. And then when the victim goes and hires the most high profile, money grubbing lawyer available (Gloria Alread or whatever her name is), that your cynic bone (if you have one) doesn't start wondering if this is just a fame & money grab.

Moore has. I think I understand why such serious charges take 40+ years to come to light. When a powerful person with authority and ability to do harm to you and your family or career threatens that they will use that power if you disclose and no one will believe you anyway, that is a powerful disincentive to actually disclose. Then someone else discloses the same or similar things happened to them. When they are believed by some, and the person accused doesn’t have the power to destroy them any more, they make the decision to disclose.

As for Gloria Allred, yes that perks my cynical side. It is certainly something I consider in my personal evaluation of the totality of the circumstances. But I’m not in a court of law, I’m in the court of public opinion. The presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt is a concept for criminal prosecution. The standard I use in the court of public opinion is “more likely than not”....a preponderance of the evidence (which is the standard of proof in civil court, btw)...no matter who the accused or accusers are.
 
I don't trust Gloria Allred, she's the equivalent of an ambulance chaser for sexual harassment cases.

Saying that we have former policemen saying this jerk was cruising for young girls at the mall. There's just to many allegations, he needs to go away.

If Mitch McConnell had not got involved pushing Luther Strange, Mo Brooks probably would of won that election and we wouldn't have this sh!t show.
 
Extremely highly suggested video from two days ago -- it's already up to 120k views.

If you have 45 minutes this weekend to listen, you won't be disappointed (and your mind will be blown).


 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
I agree completely with this but I will say that as far as media coverage it gets a lot more attention when someone who is considered conservative or right wing or Christian and is mostly ignored when they are liberal or left wing or Islamic.

Load of BS. The media covers them regardless of affiliation. Anthony Weiner, Weinstein, Franken. They aren't picking and choosing.
 
Extremely highly suggested video from two days ago -- it's already up to 120k views.

If you have 45 minutes this weekend to listen, you won't be disappointed (and your mind will be blown).



I will save the rest of you 3 minutes of your life. I got to the part where the guy says that the "Cabal" set up the area adjacent to the Mandalay Bay as their "ritual slaughter site" and had been planning this event since before the MB was built, then had to stop listening.

But, NZ was right. My mind was blown. I am now wondering how there can possibly be multiple people who believe this crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wino
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT