Jon Murphy answers your questions about China and steel:
http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2018/MurphyJtariffs.html
http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2018/MurphyJtariffs.html
The line is cloudy. I read it to mean 3% of US steel production.3% of us steel shipments go to defense.
That’s 3% of all steel we make and buy or just 3% of what we make?
The line is cloudy. I read it to mean 3% of US steel production.
Now, Harry, you're just being obstinate. He says in the article that the majority of imported steel is long steel used for construction (I-beams, trusses, etc.). But even if the 3% figure is for imported steel that represents a tiny fraction of the demand for steel, and would easily be shifted to defense if necessary. It is obvious that Trump's use of "national security" was purely an attempt to skirt congress.And none of the imported steel goes to defense?
It’s hard to draw conclusions without more clear figures.
What would the steel needs become in a major wartime scenario and could those needs be solely met with domestic production?Now, Harry, you're just being obstinate. He says in the article that the majority of imported steel is long steel used for construction (I-beams, trusses, etc.). But even if the 3% figure is for imported steel that represents a tiny fraction of the demand for steel, and would easily be shifted to defense if necessary. It is obvious that Trump's use of "national security" was purely an attempt to skirt congress.
Now, Harry, you're just being obstinate. He says in the article that the majority of imported steel is long steel used for construction (I-beams, trusses, etc.). But even if the 3% figure is for imported steel that represents a tiny fraction of the demand for steel, and would easily be shifted to defense if necessary. It is obvious that Trump's use of "national security" was purely an attempt to skirt congress.