There is no such thing as fair.
WTH? There's "fair" so much we don't even think about it. That's why unfairness sticks out.
Fairness and justice and opportunity overlap a great deal. Demanding and seeking fairness, that ideal that everybody oughta get their opportunity, is what makes us great. Entitled dukes and sociopaths don't get too whipped up about fairness. Other than that, who's against some equal opportunity and a level playing field? It's unfair that many people just aren't ever getting a shot at real opportunity and that's probably what offends me most about conservatives. They're more interested in protecting built-in entitlements and could care less about other people also getting their shot. Getting a shot is what makes this country different.
WTH? There's "fair" so much we don't even think about it. That's why unfairness sticks out.
Fairness and justice and opportunity overlap a great deal. Demanding and seeking fairness, that ideal that everybody oughta get their opportunity, is what makes us great. Entitled dukes and sociopaths don't get too whipped up about fairness. Other than that, who's against some equal opportunity and a level playing field? It's unfair that many people just aren't ever getting a shot at real opportunity and that's probably what offends me most about conservatives. They're more interested in protecting built-in entitlements and could care less about other people also getting their shot. Getting a shot is what makes this country different.
That's some good trolling right there. It's a good thing you don't really think this way.WTH? There's "fair" so much we don't even think about it. That's why unfairness sticks out.
Fairness and justice and opportunity overlap a great deal. Demanding and seeking fairness, that ideal that everybody oughta get their opportunity, is what makes us great. Entitled dukes and sociopaths don't get too whipped up about fairness. Other than that, who's against some equal opportunity and a level playing field? It's unfair that many people just aren't ever getting a shot at real opportunity and that's probably what offends me most about conservatives. They're more interested in protecting built-in entitlements and could care less about other people also getting their shot. Getting a shot is what makes this country different.
Thanks for the morning laugh!
I think I'm beginning to see where some of your disconnects originate.
Which, then, sheds light on the motivation of your behavior on this board.
And Goldman Sachs bankers who back Obama.I figured you'd hate the idea of little guys getting the same opportunity as trust fund babies.
Weak.
How so? What other politician in the history of the USA has received more money from investement bankers? The types of people who work so hard to make it so "unfair" to the little guys.
Oh wow. The epitome of the liberal mind right there. As long as it benefits Democrats it's a great thing.So does taking money from Goldman Sachs make it unfair for the little guys? How so?
Interesting take Nippon with your four examples. I would guess that a vast majority of people would agree with your statement of being not-fair for the first three examples listed. And you know what, they would have a legitimate point.
How true. I was in Walmart recently and a man showed me a clipboard with the logos for 8-10 different programs (food stamps, AFDC, WIC, etc.) listed on it. He said if I was receiving any one of these programs I could get a free cell phone.Our definition of "poor" is really messed up here. On,y country in the world where the supposedly "poor" have IPhones and are obese.
I'm curious as to why you think we dont have equal opportunity, sys?
How true. I was in Walmart recently and a man showed me a clipboard with the logos for 8-10 different programs (food stamps, AFDC, WIC, etc.) listed on it. He said if I was receiving any one of these programs I could get a free cell phone.
I asked if I could get a free cell phone since I was already paying for those programs. Both he and the cashier (minorities) gave me "Go to Hell" looks.
You're not telling me anything new. One of my companies is a vendor to Sec 8 housing. It's amazing the waste, fraud and abuse those people get away with. The biggest problem is all these programs can be applied for online via the honor system. Once approved, there is no verification of eligibility or change in economic status. Once on the programs there is no mechanism to remove anyone.I work on the "front lines" so to speak. The overwhelmingly majority of the "poor" here are "poor" due to their own life decisions, namely drug usage. I saw a breakdown of benefits available to these folks (section 8, food stamps, welfare, subsidized day care) and the yearly value of these entitlements was over $40,000. And yet the Democrats, I mean quasi-Marxists, want to give more money away. Total madness.
PS. @BIGOSUFAN ive seen you rip people for getting something for nothing on here quite a bit.
Incidentally were you brought up poor? Tell me how the kids of these lazy, poor drug abusers have equal opportunity and then I'll answer your question.
Do you acknowledge that fraud and blatant misuse is rampant in the welfare system?
You must have been the shit playing Frogger. You tried hard not to, but you did answer my question.Define "welfare" please. What is welfare?
For the sake of argument, sure, like in our military, road construction system, electrical generation system, air traffic control, social security, medicare, space exploration, ag subsidies.... the computers alone that they buy and leave mothballed at Tinker AFB just because it's in the budget is insane. That's one little tiny example.
My question is why does it keep conservatives up at night but other "waste" just generates a collective yawn?
You must have been the shit playing Frogger. You tried hard not to, but you did answer my question.
You know the reason Dems don't like the thought of clamping down on professional welfare recipients. They make up a decent percentage of the votes. The low information single issue voter is the spine of the Democratic Party and they have to be kept on the tit by any means possible to keep them coming to the polls. You know it's true. You're just not honest enough to admit it.
A whole lot of drivel with no substance. Why I expected more I have no idea.Rush isn't hear to think for you -- the other side also gets to make points and shift narratives outside of what you've heard, and sometimes they bring up facts that aren't worldview dependent -- they're just facts. At least, that's how it works outside of the right wing helmet. Most democrats dislike welfare dependency as much as you do. They just focus on real life solutions instead of bitching and getting livid about it. I still haven't heard a real world solution from you, fwiw.
I didn't avoid your question, I asked for clarification and then answered it to avoid you whining that your question wasn't answered. Again, what specifically is the "welfare" that you're referring to? This is obviously a big issue to you, I'm assuming you can identify the specific programs you find so objectionable.
I've never listened to Limbaugh and don't watch any 24/7 news channels, but thanks for the very weak and mindless liberal flame attempt. You're at least staying on script. The party is proud I'm sure. Hillary loves you.
Oooooooo, burn? You'd think eventually you would step outside of the usual liberal "blame Bush, blame Fox News, blame Limbaugh" liberal talking points and actually post something substantive.You'd think eventually you'd inform yourself about the topic you're so passionate about.
It's really OK to think outside of the liberal box. Maybe you'll figure that out when you gain some maturity.