There are many government employees who, by their own admissions, sit in front of computers and watch porn all day. Likewise, many government employees sit in empty building and offices as caretakers. I consider those bullshit jobs.
I think you make a good point about the armed forces. The author's point, as I read it, was that the only reason soldiers are needed is because other countries have soldiers. If no one had an army there would be no need to invent an army. As regards the work that soldiers do following natural disasters I imagine the author would say they are used for those purposes because otherwise they wouldn't have anything to do, they would be paid for sitting around. The purpose of a soldier is to fight in battles. Natural disaster cleanup, etc . could - and probably should - be handled by others. It's a minor discrepancy at any rate.Don't agree with much of this article, or at least with many of the jobs they considered 'pointless'. The armed forces example is pretty short-sighted. He's clearly never seen the National Guard or Armed Forces step up following a hurricane, wildfire, or other major disaster. They do much more than just shoot other armies. And there is a difference between a BS job and a bad job, which this article seems to intertwine. Cold callers and call center operators have jobs that provide a value to the company. The jobs are terrible and suck the life and soul out of the employee (and the customer in many cases), but they aren't BS jobs. Boxtickers are annoying, but I guarantee if the company isn't the one who is asking for the box to be checked.
I think you make a good point about the armed forces. The author's point, as I read it, was that the only reason soldiers are needed is because other countries have soldiers. If no one had an army there would be no need to invent an army. As regards the work that soldiers do following natural disasters I imagine the author would say they are used for those purposes because otherwise they wouldn't have anything to do, they would be paid for sitting around. The purpose of a soldier is to fight in battles. Natural disaster cleanup, etc . could - and probably should - be handled by others. It's a minor discrepancy at any rate.
Good point. I think the author was talking about how the employee felt about the job, not whether the employer found it worthwhile.Outside of governmental or tribal gold brickers; there's no such thing as a BS private sector job. If your employer finds value in someone guarding an empty room or pushing a button on an elevator or opening a door - so be it. That's their value determination to make.
Well that's an asinine point to make.Good point. I think the author was talking about how the employee felt about the job, not whether the employer found it worthwhile.
In what way is it asinine? The whole point of the article was to reflect on how people valued their jobs. I know I would consider a job that required me to guard an empty room to be pointless regardless of what the employer thought. I don’t see it as asinine at all. Different people have different perspectives, I suppose.Well that's an asinine point to make.
In what way is it asinine? The whole point of the article was to reflect on how people valued their jobs. I know I would consider a job that required me to guard an empty room to be pointless regardless of what the employer thought. I don’t see it as asinine at all. Different people have different perspectives, I suppose.
In what way is it asinine? The whole point of the article was to reflect on how people valued their jobs. I know I would consider a job that required me to guard an empty room to be pointless regardless of what the employer thought. I don’t see it as asinine at all. Different people have different perspectives, I suppose.
Damn it. Gave Toon a like. What's the world coming to?
Had to have been a pro-weed related post.I gave him a like once.