DNC lawsuit. Bad idea?
- Thread starter HanAholeSolo2.0
- Start date
TDS leads to being focused on only one thing, not the big picture. The people that thought they were the smartest people on earth continue to not learn from stupid mistakes, like putting your emails on an unsecured server. And these are the people that believe they were a mental match for other world leaders. They have a hard on for Trump and they are thinking with their little head. Are they really this stupid strategically? They are out to prove some narrative that is just not true. Maybe it is god complex as well. TDS, stupidity, god complex, and thinking with your little head. They also are bringing up their own dirty laundry by doing this, just in time for mid-terms.
They probably will destroy evidence and laugh at the court, eventually their game is going to catch up to them. They think they made the rules to the game, but eventually someone is going to throw unpredictable and uncontrollable events in their game, nothing can be totally controlled, especially with this much sniffing going on.
This makes me giddy
Debbie wassadogbiscuit and cankanklestink are probably frothing at their respective "lips"; deer lowered, please no freakin' film EVER!
@CowboyJD how many Shasta cola and early times mixed drinks will it take to get wrapped around this post?
I could start chugging now and I’d probably get there in time for 8a Sunday Mass.
Nah...I’m good dawg.
Also, no early times in the house any way.. I’m down to a couple of bottles of Jameson and the wife’s half bottle of apple vodka.
what are the odds Trump has spies in the dnc encouraging bad ideas like this?
Not high, IMO. They are more than capable of coming up with really bad ideas all on their own.
Last edited:
Not a good idea.
As to deposing all those listed - that would be fun.
Perez not the brightest bulb IMO.
As to deposing all those listed - that would be fun.
Perez not the brightest bulb IMO.
Also the DNC has struggled in the fundraising dept. could be a “theme” to get more fund raising dough but surely a suit like this would be very costly so at best would be a wash. Suit seems like an idea, sautéed in desperation and cooked with ground unicorn horn.
My first thought.......
My first thought.......
Last edited:
You just ruined my Sunday. But, I've had rabies shots so I'm protected.
Their words are just vomit at this point:
The lawsuit alleged that Trump’s campaign “gleefully welcomed Russia’s help” in the 2016 election and accuses it of being a “racketeering enterprise” that worked in tandem with Moscow.
“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign,” said Tom Perez, chair of the DNC. “This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery.”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5ada66eae4b009869bf96537/amp
The lawsuit alleged that Trump’s campaign “gleefully welcomed Russia’s help” in the 2016 election and accuses it of being a “racketeering enterprise” that worked in tandem with Moscow.
“During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign,” said Tom Perez, chair of the DNC. “This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery.”
https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5ada66eae4b009869bf96537/amp
Oh yeah I bet they realize how nuts they are and how losing to literally hitler and his nazi party is not ideal. They probably clean it up real quick after the elections.
I heard they have hired a few more pr consultants to figure out how to not alienate middle of the road voters. They got them working in shifts!!
The DNC probably just facilitated a years worth of funding for Wikileaks.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/23/roger-stone-dnc-lawsuit-discovery/
Interesting article based on the suite.
Interesting article based on the suite.
Worked great in 1972 for $threequartermillion!
Let Rachel explain it (3:00)—Sue the bastards!!!
Worked great in 1972 for $threequartermillion!
Let Rachel explain it (3:00)—Sue the bastards!!!
https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/levin-democrat-party-just-made-massive-mistake/
She KO’d O’reilly in ratings—now blew past Hannity...No 1 political show on cable
Don’t think Levin could hang....
She ko’d Oreilly in ratings? Not saying you made that up out of thin air I just never heard that. You got a link?
What percentage of episodes since she and Sean have been on the air has she beat hannity? @CBradSmith can do the math if you provide the data.
Worked great in 1972 for $threequartermillion!
Let Rachel explain it (3:00)—Sue the bastards!!!
That’s the oligarch media talking head who asked his Twitter followers donate to fellow 1%-er McCabe’s legal defense fund.
He could have at least warned them: “no refunds.”
My bad. Got a little hot in the kitchen and Oreilly just quit.
Rachel will still be on the air long after Hannity becomes a realtor...
I’m starting to think you are a dishonest poster.
Will you save your reputation by answering my question about what percent of the time Rachel has beat hannity in ratings?
This from the guy who told the world “it’s Doug”—then threw his OSU employee “sources” under the bus
I just said my bad. She didn’t beat him in ratings, he just quit the business after she tore him up so bad...
Referring to Maddow versus hannity. Yes we established you lied about bill oreilly.
Lol I just realized what you were talking about Doug. Please tell me you are joking. Can you find that thread so we can relive it?
I mis-wrote and corrected the mistake.
You on the other hand lied about the next men’s bb coach at OSU and never said squat
Then you threw your “sources” under the bus who never told you any such thing;; Holder hadn’t even told anybody!!!
Please find that thread and post here so everyone knows what a liar I am.
Man I’m looking forward to this.
