Comey just "cleared" her....
- Thread starter JimmyBob
- Start date
In a sense, this could end up being worse for Hillary.
Planned event to take the focus off Wikileaks. He needs to be looking for a new job come January and that bitch needs to be in prison playing with scissors.
Last edited:
You mean he doesn't want to murder his family then commit suicide with a double tap to the back of the head then light his house on fire just before death?
He should release those emails so the American people can decide for themselves.
The speed at which this announcement was made leads me to believe that this whole thing was more about trying to quell disfavor within the ranks of the FBI than actually doing much further investigation.
It seems to me it would be insulting to the ranks to announce this in the space of a week.
Also, just FYI, my previous job (you know the one everyone golf clapped) developed the software they use.
An individual does not physically look at each email, it is a key word search.
They also likely loaded key words found in any of the 35k from before. When a key word is flagged, then someone physically reviews that email.
An individual does not physically look at each email, it is a key word search.
They also likely loaded key words found in any of the 35k from before. When a key word is flagged, then someone physically reviews that email.
Nah....many of them will be satisfied that he took a shot at announcing it over the objections of the AG and the rest of the DOJ. For the rank and file it the appaearance of being independent is more important than whether or not they really are. The NY office was going to make their own announcement if Comey didn't.
They (the entire FBI) are a weird gang since....forever. I'm not a big fan.
It's weird that you agree with this statement I've made after seemingly questioning the credibility of my FBI statements earlier....which are what lead me to this conclusion.
Just saying...
I don't think it is an explicit one.
Maybe a compromise by Comey trying to satisfy his people. Announce and say no change in the last week of the election to quiet them a little maybe.
Completely incorrect; I questioned that individuals at that level of classified information would be blabbing to the world when they were investigating a woman blabbing classified information to the world.
Makes sense to me though - capitulate to Lynch's political pressure on Weinergate and make the statement before the election, then DOJ doesn't push back as much on Clinton Foundation investigation?
Because. Jesus man.
You quoted me and characterized it as Carlsoning in reference to Jenni Carlson.
If that's not questioning someone's credibility, I'm not sure what it is.
I understand why you're crawdadding away from that now. It would have been more credible if you had tried to make this difference without substance earlier.
It's all good though.
You quoted what I had been told by FBI Agents as said this
I guess you were talking about the generic "you" after quoting me directly.
Because that first sentence DEFINITELY questions the credibility of whomever it was directed....and it was certainly reasonable to conclude it was directed at me since you had quoted and were responding directly to my quote when you wrote it.
I guess you were talking about the generic "you" after quoting me directly.
Because that first sentence DEFINITELY questions the credibility of whomever it was directed....and it was certainly reasonable to conclude it was directed at me since you had quoted and were responding directly to my quote when you wrote it.
You means any generic person who says someone said something but you can't attribute anyone saying something to anyone.
I don't gotta crawdad when I'm one of the few people on the board with the integrity to actually own up to something I said (ref Steven Adams draft).
Sorry you took offense at me being generic... is that a sign?
I don't gotta crawdad when I'm one of the few people on the board with the integrity to actually own up to something I said (ref Steven Adams draft).
Sorry you took offense at me being generic... is that a sign?
Which I did in the statement you quoted, right?
I can go quote it too if you'd like.
Nice redraft of your post after being quoted.
Is that second sentence a calling out of someone specific or more generic attribution? I don't even have a damn clue what you are talking about RE: whatever was said about the Steven Adams draft. Telling yourself that you're one of the few people on this board with integrity is ego self-masturbation of the highest order. Congratulations on that.
Just when I think you're actually going to own what you said like someone with integrity, you crawdad away.
Disappointing.
I dunno the answer to your question here.
You're one of the few guys on this board with any integrity. Maybe you should look it up and decide for yourself.
Because I didn't but if you think I did, **** you. That's all that meant. Nothing personal. Read better next time.
I read fine. You "generically" questioned the credibility of someone that did exactly what you were questioning (generically) in the quote you were responding to. Pretty simple.
And keep fooling yourself about being a man of integrity on this board after this quoted response....you're not fooling anyone else.
