ADVERTISEMENT

College removes paintings of Native Americans after diversity group complains

windriverrange

Heisman Candidate
Gold Member
Jul 7, 2008
10,200
14,724
113
Catoosa
Unbelievable...but then again it's a university in Wisconsin. GO DLT!

The University of Wisconsin-Stout has decided to take down historical paintings that show interactions between white settlers and First Nations people because of their potentially “harmful” effects on students and viewers. The move was sparked by complaints from a diversity group.

One of the paintings shows French fur traders canoeing down the Red Cedar River with American Indians; the other is of a French fort. Both were painted by artist Cal Peters in 1936 and were recently restored with funding by the Wisconsin Historical Society.

After 80 years of decorating the university’s Harvey Hall, the paintings caught the attention of the school’s Diversity Leadership Team (DLT), which complained to the administration that this depiction of First Nations people reinforced racial stereotypes and promoted “acts of domination and oppression.”

After a series of consultations with students, Chancellor Bob Meyer announced the works would removed from the first and second floors of Harvey Hall, as they risked “having a harmful effect on our students and other viewers.”

If the paintings are displayed, it should be in a “controlled gallery space,” he said, with appropriate “context”for viewers. However, the school says that for now, Peters’ works will most likely stay out of public view.
 
d8bd63cd8a80240bcb40f55d59ce44d5.jpg
 
Bury my Heart at Wounded Knee should be mandatory reading in public education. Maybe then, idiots can look at 100 year old paintings of 200 year old events and not get idiotic, offensive 'feelings' from them.

All of my solutions always go back to education, but that's what kills me about PCness. Maybe if you have students read about history and culture and interaction between the two, they can be educated and intelligent enough not to be offended by words and pictures and have triggers. And instead just take whatever some idiot is saying with a grain of salt and recognize them as an idiot and continue on with their day. Better than try to limit the scope of what someone can say/do/view, which only results in increasing the power of the word/action/image they are trying to suppress. Which (I assume) is the opposite of what these groups are trying to accomplish.
 
i would agree with this but we would have to take down all references of any battle or conquering post land bridge crossing.

I would think any pictures of the Pawnee or Apache would need to be moved to conference rooms immediately. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Why does history become racist when the color of the skin drops below a certain shade on the color chart?
 
Those running these universities have backbones of cooked Linguini.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT