The Reckless Brinkmanship With Russia Just Keeps On Escalating
It’s damn near impossible to keep up with all the warmongering of the western empire these days.
caitlinjohnstone.com.au
Caitlin Johnstone Writes More About The American Empire
- Thread starter Ponca Dan
- Start date
caitlinjohnstone.com.au
She has a substantial international following.
CJ is not one of them. Otherwise a brilliant guy like you wouldn’t be scared to rebut what she writes.
Why would I burn calories on a person who’s chosen profession is to trick the slow?
If you don’t like living in an empire, then maybe you should find a nice vassal state in which to live out your days. I hear Morocco has nice beaches.
I hear Chernobyl is nice in the Summer but hotter than it used to be. Perhaps because of Climate Change. Hmmm 🤣
Don't knock it. I had a place in Tangier overlooking the Gibraltar Strait. $600 a month, market fresh grilled seafood every night, and unlimited cheap hashish.
Then Ponca Dave should be really happy there. Sounds like I’d be rather happy there as well.
She's not wrong, but she misses the point of the whole thing. I believe we're already committed to sending troops to defend Ukraine. But not even Biden's media machine could get the Democratic party re-elected if US troops start dieing there. Russia is escalating because they know the US is limited in how far it can escalate back in the next 5 months. The NATO escalated response of allowing western weapons to strike Russia is just an effort to buy time until the election is over. Then you can bet NATO (aka US) troops will be doing the fighting. At first they'll just serve as 'reserve forces' to allow Ukrainian reserves to rotate to the front lines. But they'll be put in harms way (intentionally?) so that NATO can escalate to full use of ground forces. This is the only way for Ukraine to be made 'whole'. If Biden gets elected, this will all play out after the inauguration, and when the media can broadcast more Trump trials and distract the lemmings. But if Trump gets elected, this will be expedited so as ensure ground troop involvement prior to Trump's inauguration so Trump's forced to support NATO and follow through with the fighting. Because if its not a NATO ground war once Trump is in office, then there will be a negotiation and the war will end and Ukraine will no longer possess either Crimea or the Donbas.The Reckless Brinkmanship With Russia Just Keeps On Escalating
It’s damn near impossible to keep up with all the warmongering of the western empire these days.
Could this eventually go nuclear? Maybe. But that would require NATO troops actually entering Russia. But it will be a ground war. Its the only logical direction.
Terrifing! I hope you are wrong, but I think you are right. Now if Netanyahu can figure out a way to get us to go to war with Iran as his proxy the demise of the American empire will be complete.
Hey! Wait a minute!!! This sounds like Vietnam!!!!!
Yoh might find this to be a worthwhile read:
False Flag On The Horizon? The Strange Case of the Destroyed Russian Nuclear Radar - LewRockwell
If we accept the fundamental truth that Ukraine is nothing more than a proxy battleground between Russia and the west, then you might say WWIII has already begun. The powers-that-be have been content to keep the situation contained primarily to Ukraine so far, but a recent event suggests things...
www.lewrockwell.com
Its ironic but I don't think Israel needs American troops to go to war with Iran. They just need permission and continued access to weaponry. Ukraine on the other hand needs more than just western weapons. They need the people who know how to use them. Most of the Ukrainian forces are still using Soviet era equipment. Their pilots train on Migs, not F-16s.
Interesting, and I'm certainly willing to believe the US would run a false flag operation. Just look at the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage. And it does strike me as strange that a "peace summit" was announced and scheduled 3 months ahead of time. But if it did occur, even if American support would rally for Ukraine, it would likely cost Biden the election. The fact it got to that point is just another example of Biden's foreign policy 'prowess'. And because of this I would have said that bombing the peace summit in June is too early. But as I think about it, that would likely rally portions of Europe, which is currently struggling with 'peasant discontent' and showing obvious signs of pro-nationalism factions growing. So who knows? But if an attack did occur on the summit, I'd consider it suspicious. I just can't see an angle where Russia would even perceive any benefit from such an attack, and thus doubt that Putin would order such a thing. He has shown tremendous patience in his war effort so far, so why act rash now?Yoh might find this to be a worthwhile read:
False Flag On The Horizon? The Strange Case of the Destroyed Russian Nuclear Radar - LewRockwell
If we accept the fundamental truth that Ukraine is nothing more than a proxy battleground between Russia and the west, then you might say WWIII has already begun. The powers-that-be have been content to keep the situation contained primarily to Ukraine so far, but a recent event suggests things...
Empire is the correct word.The Reckless Brinkmanship With Russia Just Keeps On Escalating
It’s damn near impossible to keep up with all the warmongering of the western empire these days.
What's the old saying: Those who forget history (or tear it down in libs case) are doomed to repeat it.
Just to note: Here's why a false flag attack on the peace summit might occur:
The left needs some kind of 'reunification' event.
Similar threads
