ADVERTISEMENT

Busted: Southern Poverty Law Center Transfers Millions in Cash to Offshore Entities

NZ Poke

Heisman Candidate
Dec 16, 2007
6,088
7,047
113
LOL

This is one of the prominent "anti-hate" groups fighting "white supremacy."

They actually ran a long celebrity-filled commercial immediately before the Mayweather vs McGregor fight last weekend.



I (along with many others) was thinking, why in the hell are there TV ads after we paid 100 bucks for this fight. Sure enough, it was SPLC.






"The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a liberal, Alabama-based 501(c)(3) tax-exempt charitable organization that has gained prominence on the left for its "hate group" designations, pushes millions of dollars to offshore entities as part of its business dealings, records show.

Additionally, the nonprofit pays lucrative six-figure salaries to its top directors and key employees while spending little on legal services despite its stated intent of "fighting hate and bigotry" using litigation, education, and other forms of advocacy.

The SPLC has turned into a fundraising powerhouse, recording more than $50 million in contributions and $328 million in net assets on its 2015 Form 990, the most recently available tax form from the nonprofit. SPLC's Form 990-T, its business income tax return, from the same year shows that they have "financial interests" in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, and Bermuda.

No information is available beyond the acknowledgment of the interests at the bottom of the form.

However, the Washington Free Beacon discovered forms from 2014 that shed light on some of the Southern Poverty Law Center's transfers to foreign entities.

SPLC lists Tiger Global Management LLC, a New York-based private equity financial firm, as an agent on its form. The form shows a foreign partnership between the SPLC and Tiger Global Private Investment Partners IX, L.P., a pooled investment fund in the Cayman Islands. SPLC transferred $960,000 in cash on Nov. 24, 2014 to Tiger Global Private Investment Partners IX, L.P, its records show.

On March 1, 2015, SPLC sent $2,200,000 to an entity incorporated in Canana Bay, Cayman Islands, according to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) records and run by a firm firm based in Greenwich, Ct. Another $2,200,000 cash transfer was made on the same day to another fund whose business is located at the same address as the previous fund in the Cayman Islands, according to SEC records.



HIGHLY SUGGESTED BELOW


:eek::eek::eek:;););)


\/ \/


Lucinda Chappelle, a principal at Jackson Thornton, the public accounting firm in Montgomery, Ala., that prepared the SPLC's tax forms, said she does not discuss client matters and hung up the phone when the Free Beacon contacted her in an attempt to get the most updated forms from the group in relation to its foreign business dealings.

Tax experts expressed confusion when being told of the transfer.

"I've never known a US-based nonprofit dealing in human rights or social services to have any foreign bank accounts," said Amy Sterling Casil, CEO of Pacific Human Capital, a California-based nonprofit consulting firm.

"My impression based on prior interactions is that they have a small, modestly paid staff, and were regarded by most in the industry as frugal and reliable. I am stunned to learn of transfers of millions to offshore bank accounts. It is a huge red flag and would have been completely unacceptable to any wealthy, responsible, experienced board member who was committed to a charitable mission who I ever worked with."
 
Below is the 45 second ad the SPLC ran directly before the Mayweather fight (literally right before --- on a $100 pay-per-view fight).


Notice all the celebrities --- the ad doesn't mention anything about the Cayman Islands, Bermuda or the British Virgin Islands.


 
  • Like
Reactions: GunsOfFrankEaton
So the organization released its books, made their financial disclosures completely public and as a result they disclose that it had put some money in a mutual fund/hedge fund as part of it's investment strategy.

They undertook NO effort to hide it from anyone and there is nothing about the transaction/investment which is illegal. (It's not like it's some sort of off-shore "tax dodge" as they are a registered non-profit and wouldn't be paying taxes on it anyway.)

I'm having a hard time understanding what is supposed to be so scandalous here?

You do realize that they likely paid nothing for those ads right? It's common practice for non-profits to get free air time and I'd bet the celebrities charged nothing for their appearances.

Were you also "triggered" by the SPLC listing the following BLACK supremacists and violent leaning BLACK separatist groups? (BTW, they have identified some 193 black hate groups, while only 130 klan affiliated hate groups.)

Active Black Separatist Hate Groups 2016:

Malik Zulu Shabazz
Washington, D.C.

Louis Farrakhan
Chicago, Ill.

Nuwaubian Nation of Moors
Georgia

Nation of Islam
Chicago, IL

New Black Panther Party
Washington, D.C.

All Eyes on Egipt Bookstore

Black Riders Liberation Party

The, Israelite Church of God
in Jesus Christ


Israelite School of Universal Practical Knowledge

Israel United In Christ

New Black Panther Party for Self Defense

Sicarii 1715

War On The Horizon

From their Website:


"Although the Southern Poverty Law Center recognizes that much black racism in America is, at least in part, a response to centuries of white racism, it believes racism must be exposed in all its forms. White groups espousing beliefs similar to black separatists would be considered clearly racist. The same criterion should be applied to all groups regardless of their color.

A leading example of a black separatist group is the Nation of Islam led by Louis Farrakhan. In 1997, and in less explicit ways since then, Farrakhan made clear that he had renounced none of the anti-white, anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic and anti-gay views of the previous Nation leader, Elijah Mohammed. Those beliefs include the view that Yacub, a renegade black "scientist," created whites 6,600 years ago as an inherently evil and ungodly people — "blue-eyed devils." Farrakhan has described Catholics and Jews, who he said practice a "gutter religion," as preying on blacks. He regrets the "tone" of a former principal subordinate who called for slaughtering white South Africans, but agreed with the message. He called for racial separatism and inveighed against interracial relationships.

I
f a white group espoused similar beliefs with the colors reversed, few would have trouble describing it as racist and anti-Semitic. Although the racism of a group like the Nation may be relatively easy to understand, if we seek to expose white hate groups, we cannot be in the business of explaining away the black ones."





 
BLM is strangely missing from the list of hate groups.
You do realize that BLM is not some "homogeneous" group with a centralized leadership organization in place don't you?

It's kind of like saying all "Tea Party" groups are the same and have the same agenda, when in fact there are/were dozens and often the philosophy and stands of one group were not in any way compatible with another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
You do realize that BLM is not some "homogeneous" group with a centralized leadership organization in place don't you?

It's kind of like saying all "Tea Party" groups are the same and have the same agenda, when in fact there are/were dozens and often the philosophy and stands of one group were not in any way compatible with another.
A centralized leadership sufficient to be invited into the Oval Office numerous times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cableok
Unfortunately, it's a lot more than just fundraising. SPLC ruins people's lives with their "hate lists."

Speaking of which, browsing their "Public Symbols of the Confederacy" has a few local items of interest (besides "Robert E Lee" schools):

Jackson County, Oklahoma
City of Stonewall, Oklahoma
The former "Confederate Veterans Home" in Ardmore....which now houses a portion of the VA facility there.


Who wants to go tear down a county in the interest of preventing violence? Better get the VA home on the way down since it once housed Confederate Vets.
 
They undertook NO effort to hide it from anyone and there is nothing about the transaction/investment which is illegal. (It's not like it's some sort of off-shore "tax dodge" as they are a registered non-profit and wouldn't be paying taxes on it anyway.)

The SPLC being a non-profit is exactly why this is a red flag.
 
So the organization released its books, made their financial disclosures completely public and as a result they disclose that it had put some money in a mutual fund/hedge fund as part of it's investment strategy.

They undertook NO effort to hide it from anyone and there is nothing about the transaction/investment which is illegal. (It's not like it's some sort of off-shore "tax dodge" as they are a registered non-profit and wouldn't be paying taxes on it anyway.)

I'm having a hard time understanding what is supposed to be so scandalous here?
...

Well, actually, it is a tax dodge. They avoid unrelated business income being taxed at US rates and instead have it taxed at a lower rate. Here's how it works: http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/why-do-us-investment-funds-operate-tax-havens
 
Well, actually, it is a tax dodge. They avoid unrelated business income being taxed at US rates and instead have it taxed at a lower rate. Here's how it works: http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxvox/why-do-us-investment-funds-operate-tax-havens

GoPokes43, please explain to me how a NON-PROFIT which pays NO TAXES to begin with, can use this investment strategy as a "tax dodge" exactly?

They are going to pay the identical amount ($0) in Federal and State Taxes with this investment set up domestically or foreign. That's not going to change, is it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen
Simple answer could be to avoid having to explain how that money is spent.

If they are a non-profit and legitimately pay no taxes why do they need offshore accounts?

SPLC is an obvious left wing political operation but there are a lot political operations that are tax except and it is all a big scam on taxpayers and the politicians are in on it.
 
GoPokes43, please explain to me how a NON-PROFIT which pays NO TAXES to begin with, can use this investment strategy as a "tax dodge" exactly?

They are going to pay the identical amount ($0) in Federal and State Taxes with this investment set up domestically or foreign. That's not going to change, is it?


wood it's fun watching you work
you're great at hammering the obvious

what's your hypothesis on splc's need for offshore accounts

surely it's obvious
 



DIl2b0lV4AEp20m
 
One of the investment firms in which they have placed funds, uses off-shore accounts to hold their money. Trying to make it much more complicated than it is.

Are any of you claiming that they are in violation of US Law? That Non-Profits must keep all funds in US Banks? That they are in violation of reporting laws?

http://www.post-gazette.com/busines...rofits-in-offshore-funds/stories/200707050316

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-cayman-islands-20141213-story.html

It seems to be a fairly common and routine practice among non-profits.
 
One of the investment firms in which they have placed funds, uses off-shore accounts to hold their money. Trying to make it much more complicated than it is.

Are any of you claiming that they are in violation of US Law? That Non-Profits must keep all funds in US Banks? That they are in violation of reporting laws?

http://www.post-gazette.com/busines...rofits-in-offshore-funds/stories/200707050316

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-cayman-islands-20141213-story.html

It seems to be a fairly common and routine practice among non-profits.


is the money in offshore banks subject to united states jurisdiction?
 
it appears that they are skirting the laws of non profits with the ability to do whatever they want with the funds in the offshore banks. I don't know exactly what they are doing but I guarantee they are a bunch of crooks and dodging something somewhere...following the footsteps of that former president nobama. Hey, it's legal!
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeak
GoPokes43, please explain to me how a NON-PROFIT which pays NO TAXES to begin with, can use this investment strategy as a "tax dodge" exactly?

They are going to pay the identical amount ($0) in Federal and State Taxes with this investment set up domestically or foreign. That's not going to change, is it?
Your assumption that non-profits pay no taxes is where you need to start over with your thoughts. They have to pay taxes on income from investments in activities unrelated to their non-profit mission - i.e., most of their investments. Research UBIT and then try again. Hint: google "UBIT and nonprofits"

For further background, you can research non-US feeder funds and how funds are set up to accommodate tax exempt investors like non-profits, pension plans, foundations, non-US investors, etc. Eg. - https://www.akingump.com/images/content/9/7/v4/974/376.pdf
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: squeak
One of the investment firms in which they have placed funds, uses off-shore accounts to hold their money. Trying to make it much more complicated than it is.

Are any of you claiming that they are in violation of US Law? That Non-Profits must keep all funds in US Banks? That they are in violation of reporting laws?

http://www.post-gazette.com/busines...rofits-in-offshore-funds/stories/200707050316

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-cayman-islands-20141213-story.html

It seems to be a fairly common and routine practice among non-profits.
On its face it doesn't look like a problem. But, it is a tax dodge that you claimed wasn't happening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeak
On its face it doesn't look like a problem. But, it is a tax dodge that you claimed wasn't happening.


thank you for your contribution to this thread

there's a reason they moved money offshore

wood smelled like he was defending a client
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeak
thank you for your contribution to this thread

there's a reason they moved money offshore

wood smelled like he was defending a client
hell, he probably was!! At least practicing!
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT