Breaking: Paul Manafort exonerated
- Thread starter DrunkenViking
- Start date
Looks like Rosenstein may be a witness. That would be worth the price of admission to watch him.
If the claims against him were criminal and Rosenstein exonerated him, I wonder if double jeopardy comes into play?
If the claims against him were criminal and Rosenstein exonerated him, I wonder if double jeopardy comes into play?
If that’s the cornerstone of the defense and it can be proven. I would guess new evidence would have to have been discovered for this to be legit right?
Rod Rosenstein investigating him and supposedly “exonerating” him has no real legal meaning. It isn’t a defense to charges subsequently filed by a different prosecuting authority. Double jeopardy doesn’t apply until legal jeopardy actually attaches the first time. Legal jeopardy at a minimum is the filing of charges (with subsequent dismissal WITH PREJUDICE TO REFILING) and usually is when a jury is empaneled and the first bit of evidence is heard then the case is dismissed due to actions of the prosecution.
I’ll be surprised if Rosenstein even ends up testifying. His exercise of discretion back then isn’t really relevant to the case and whether or not their is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Also, I’d be interested in seeing what in the hell Nap is talking about and referring to “exoneration”.
So...color me dubious.
Good example...Cosby was supposedly “exonerated” by the prior DA saying he wasn’t gonna file against him. New DA...boom....convicted.
And that supposed “exoneration” was a formal agreement to not file charges because the civil case settled.
And that supposed “exoneration” was a formal agreement to not file charges because the civil case settled.
exercising prosecutorial descression isn't even remotely like exoneration.
You are welcome.
I have seen this at my agency pretty routinely in state prosecutions and occasionally in federal prosecutions.
We present our investigation to the DA. S/he says...cant file due to insufficient evidence. New DA is elected (or new US Atty appointed), boom...charges filed on exact same evidence and investigation.
Also, you kind of have to think all the investigating that was done by Mueller’s team was more and turned up a little something different than a simple rehash of an old investigation.
This is as good a place as any
Hey Pussyhats
Remember all the times I brought up Manafort connections to Pedoesta, Ukraine, Hillary?
Well fvck me blind!!!
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/01/ton...ation-following-special-counsel-referral.html
Want to keep avoiding facts?
That said in an assholish way
I keep going back and forth on Mueller.
Hey Pussyhats
Remember all the times I brought up Manafort connections to Pedoesta, Ukraine, Hillary?
Well fvck me blind!!!
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/01/ton...ation-following-special-counsel-referral.html
Want to keep avoiding facts?
That said in an assholish way
I keep going back and forth on Mueller.
And
Fvck me sideways
Someone else catching on.
Pussyhats having a real bad ‘18
Gonna get worse
http://www.bostonherald.com/opinion/op_ed/2018/07/fisa_documents_reveal_fbi_collusion
Fvck me sideways
Someone else catching on.
Pussyhats having a real bad ‘18
Gonna get worse
http://www.bostonherald.com/opinion/op_ed/2018/07/fisa_documents_reveal_fbi_collusion
Based upon the defense’s opening statement, it doesn’t appear to be the cornerstone of his defense. It looks like it’s going to blame Gates, his former partner.
Two things...
First, begging for dick on this board isn't a good look for you. Get that app, the one that lets you find other dudes and have at it. No judgement from me.
Second, an opinion piece from the bankrupt Boston Herald - surely you can do better no?
Reviewing some live blogs, opening statements, and first witness....this is looking like a garden variety tax/bank fraud prosecution with a garden variety “no intent to deceive or knowingly violate tax laws” defense.
Actually it’s the opinion of one L. Hollis. Never heard of her, and it is unknown whether she is bankrupt or not. Not sure what bankruptcy has to do with the opinion piece, or in what way bankruptcy discredits the opinion. Can you explain?
You guys quote the NYT and CNN opinion peices all the time and think it’s dumb we call it fake news
That said, this isn’t fake news
You’ll see.
Oh, and I feel sad for you
You’ve obviously never had a woman fvck you
Fan of the dead fish variety?
Tom Steyer
Get ready to hear the name
Get ready to hear about his investments
Get ready for the Pussyhats to sing his praises
They hated the Koch brothers
Until they disagreed with BDD
Now they cannot defend them enough
Steyer will have Maxine Waters all wet and shit
#INPEACH
Get ready to hear the name
Get ready to hear about his investments
Get ready for the Pussyhats to sing his praises
They hated the Koch brothers
Until they disagreed with BDD
Now they cannot defend them enough
Steyer will have Maxine Waters all wet and shit
#INPEACH
The Steyer’s love the Pedoestas
Especially Tom’s brother Jim
Did you guys know John Pedoesta is a master of cuisine?
Apparently walnut sauce on pasta is yum yum highly recommended.
Especially Tom’s brother Jim
Did you guys know John Pedoesta is a master of cuisine?
Apparently walnut sauce on pasta is yum yum highly recommended.
Never sideways, how would that even work? I have been blinded once or twice however....
All sarcasm aside. How does the claim that the newspaper is bankrupt discredit the opinion contained within it?
It's the old discredit the messenger and ignore the message ploy.
You have never dated an Asian woman or you would know..
You might ask DJT. His go to line when faced with criticism from the media is "the failing XYZ" - the Boston Herald failed and was sold via bankruptcy auction a year or two ago.
Latest posts
-
-
90 Million Shady Transactions from Over 4 Million Government Credit Cards- Latest: OctaviusRexLTH1
-
-
-
