Biden's Poll Numbers Are Looking Up
- Thread starter 2012Bearcat
- Start date
Still waiting @Ponca Dan. Why are you having such a hard time with this question? You are the one who brought this topic up after all.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Joe Biden's Job Approval Numbers Are Second Lowest in Over 60 Years: Poll
Biden's approval rating has been stuck in the low 40s for the past six months, according to Gallup.
www.newsweek.com
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Biden’s dismal poll numbers imperil Dem Senate control
The president’s popularity is dangerously low in the four states where Democratic incumbents are most endangered.
www.politico.com
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Democrats lose Hispanic and blue-collar voters at same time - Washington Examiner
Hispanic voters are rapidly reevaluating their relationship with the Democratic Party, creating a problem for Democrats that, in some ways, mirrors their struggle to retain working-class voters.A Quinnipiac poll published last week found that Hispanic voters disapproved of President Joe Biden’s...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Biden and Dems Should Be Terrified by New Poll Numbers
Democrats already expected to be wiped out in the midterms, but Biden’s abysmal approval ratings with Hispanic voters show it could get so much worse.
www.thedailybeast.com
I sense a beatdown has occurred.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Joe Biden's Job Approval Numbers Are Second Lowest in Over 60 Years: Poll
Biden's approval rating has been stuck in the low 40s for the past six months, according to Gallup.
Your late night spree of link posting was pointless. None of the links you provided answered the question I asked of @Ponca Dan.Joe Biden's Job Approval Numbers Are Second Lowest in Over 60 Years: Poll
Biden's approval rating has been stuck in the low 40s for the past six months, according to Gallup.
Just more useless flailing from you.
@Ponca Dan, still waiting on you to clarify your simple claim.
Since you apparently can't do that, I guess it is safe to conclude that, once again, you can't explain your position. That is after all, the standard you impose on others.
Since you apparently can't do that, I guess it is safe to conclude that, once again, you can't explain your position. That is after all, the standard you impose on others.
I think I've got my answer.
Gallup noted that Biden’s average approval rating for this point in his term is lower than all other predecessors going back to the 1950s, with the exception of former President Trump, who had a 39.1 percent favorability during the same period in his term.
Karma always lurks.
Awrsome. You voted for an old demented actual racist corrupt kid groping shitbag who is as bad as Trump despite the fawning media coverage. I think you should start building an ark. The tears are going to flood your house in November.
And after all the actual work he did on the exterior of his house a few years ago !
I’m sorry to take so long to reply. I actually have a life beyond this board and it occasionally drags me away. But to your question, I’m not sure what the normal loss in House seats is for the party in power at midterm elections. Maybe 20? 25? So for me it would be an ass kicking if the Democrats lose 30 seats in the House and a couple of Senators. But that’s just what I’d guess, and my opinion is immaterial in this case. You’re the one that gets to gloat if it’s “normal” and man up if it’s an ass kicking. So tell us in advance, right here right now what you would consider an ass kicking. Then come November we can’t squish out if it's normal and you can’t squish out if its your own version of an ass kicking. So tell us: what would you consider to be an ass kicking?
Actually your opinion is material in this case if we are going to reach an agreement on what constitutes an "ass kicking."
Maybe we could start with recent history. Looking at Trump, Obama, and Clinton's first midterm. I'm excluding W. Bush because the '02 midterms took place a little less than fourteen months after the 9-11 attack, which greatly changed the dynamics of that midterm for the party in the White House
In 1994, Democrats lost 54 seats in the House and 10 seats in the Senate. In 2010, Democrats lost 63 seats in the House and 6 seats in the Senate. In 2018, Republicans lost 41 seats in the House but gained two seats in the Senate. Minus the Senate in 2018, these numbers are way higher than the numbers you proposed for an ass-kicking to be declared. Do you consider these losses to be an ass-kicking or a major ass-kicking?
I would say both the '94 and '10 election were ass-kicking for the Democrats. The '18 election, not so much for the Republicans, especially since they gained seats in the Senate. It wasn't a good election for them (they did lose the House), but not nearly as bad as '94 and '10.
So looking at these three elections, I would say an ass-kicking is something similar to '94 and '10. Perhaps a +50 seat loss in the House and a +5 loss in the Senate for Democrats.
It would also be important to note that these elections for Democrats in '94 and '10 didn't accurately predict what was going to happen in the presidential election two years later. Both Clinton and Obama won re-election. Trump, whose midterm wasn't as bad as Clinton and Obama's, was the one who failed to win re-election. Therefore, in this agreement we are trying to reach, I think us acknowledging that the outcome of the '22 midterms doesn't automatically predict what is going to happen in the '24 election is important as well.
Okay, we have your target numbers. Anything less than 50 House seats and 5 Senate seats will constitute an electoral victory for Democrats in your mind. Now we know your numbers.
The only way the Democrats can claim electoral victory in '22 in my view is if they keep control of the House. Losing the House (as I expect them to do) and losing seats in the Senate (as I expect them to do) isn't an electoral victory. Now, in terms of political spin and the expectations game, the less seats they lose will of course allow Democrats to say '22 wasn't as bad as it could have been and/or predicated.
With that said, I will accept those numbers and also state for the record that I expect Democrats to lose around those number of seats. I fully expect '22 to look similar to '94 and '10 for the Democrats. So I am agreeing that an ass-kicking is in store for Democrats come '22.
Will you agree too that the outcome of the '22 midterms doesn't automatically predict what is going to happen in the '24 presidential election?
Only one problem with your numbers. Since those elections Democrats and Republicans in the states have manage to secure safe districts thru the redistricting process for each party, meaning there are not as many competitive House seats as there has been in past elections. I don't think we will ever see 50+ changes in the House again as long as the current congressional maps stay in place.
If things are as bad as Republicans want voters to believe, and if the political energy remains strong with Republicans as one would expect in this midterm, I see no reason why we couldn't see a repeat of '94 and '10 for Democrats.
Again, I fully expect a big loss for Democrats this November, just as they experienced in the first midterms of the past two Democratic presidents.
Absolutely I agree with that. And absolutely I don’t care, because I don’t vote for any of them. Even if it’s an ass kicking I fully expect the Republicans to be just as dysfunctional as they always have been.
I fully expect the Republicans to overreach after the midterms.
Politics is often cyclical.
There's absolutely no doubt that Mitch and Kevin could f*ck up a rock fight; my expectations of them accomplishing anything productive are somewhere below whale shit.
Well thought out. 2022 finds Biden's inflationary tidal wave.
It has begun…
House Republicans plot to impeach Mayorkas
The Republican Study Committee is laying groundwork to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
www.axios.com
“Only one Cabinet official has ever been impeached, according to the House historian.
- Secretary of War William Belknap was impeached by the House, and later acquitted by the Senate, in 1876 for allegedly taking bribes.”
Do you think he's done his job? The southern border says "no."It has begun…
House Republicans plot to impeach Mayorkas
The Republican Study Committee is laying groundwork to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
“Only one Cabinet official has ever been impeached, according to the House historian.
- Secretary of War William Belknap was impeached by the House, and later acquitted by the Senate, in 1876 for allegedly taking bribes.”
Cartels control the border.
The American politicians they've paid off allow them to do it.
Which talking points, turd brain? The ones where opiate overdoses are through the roof? I have no doubt you approve of human smuggling. You were born a loser.
Four latest polls on Biden's approval...
Poll: Biden approval rating hits all-time low of 33 percent
The latest Speed Read,/speed-reads,,speed-reads, breaking news, comment, reviews and features from the experts at The Weektheweek.com
Just kidding ain't no way in hell Biden's poll numbers are anything but at record lows. The only thing looking up is the American people are figuring out what a mistake Biden is.
44%, 43%, 43%, 45%
Why didn't you post about these polls @2012Bearcat?
Biden Approval Index History
| Date | Approval Index | Strongly Approve | Strongly Disapprove | Total Approve | Total Disapprove |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03-May-22 | -24 | 22% | 46% | 43% | 55% |
| 02-May-22 | -23 | 23% | 46% | 44% | 54% |
| 29-Apr-22 | -25 | 22% | 47% | 42% | 55% |
| 28-Apr-22 | -26 | 22% | 48% | 42% | 57% |
| 27-Apr-22 | -28 | 21% | 49% | 41% | 58% |
| 26-Apr-22 | -25 | 22% | 47% | 41% | 58% |
| 25-Apr-22 | -24 | 23% | 47% | 42% | 57% |
| 22-Apr-22 | -24 | 22% | 46% | 41% | 57% |
| 21-Apr-22 | -24 | 22% | 46% | 43% | 56% |
| 20-Apr-22 | -24 | 22% | 46% | 43% | 56% |
| 19-Apr-22 | -19 | 25% | 44% | 45% | 53% |
| 18-Apr-22 | -22 | 23% | 45% | 44% | 54% |
| 15-Apr-22 | -25 | 21% | 46% | 41% | 57% |
| 14-Apr-22 | -27 | 20% | 47% | 40% | 58% |
| 13-Apr-22 | -26 | 21% | 47% | 41% | 58% |
| 12-Apr-22 | -26 | 22% | 48% | 41% | 58% |
| 11-Apr-22 | -26 | 22% | 48% | 42% | 57% |
| 08-Apr-22 | -27 | 22% | 49% | 41% | 57% |
| 07-Apr-22 | -22 | 25% | 47% | 43% | 55% |
| 06-Apr-22 | -22 | 24% | 46% | 42% | 56% |
| 05-Apr-22 | -24 | 23% | 47% | 42% | 56% |
| 04-Apr-22 | -25 | 22% | 47% | 42% | 56% |
| 01-Apr-22 | -27 | 21% | 48% | 40% | 58% |
| 31-Mar-22 | -24 | 22% | 46% | 42% | 57% |
| 30-Mar-22 | -24 | 23% | 47% | 41% | 58% |
| 29-Mar-22 | -22 | 24% | 46% | 43% | 56% |
| 28-Mar-22 | -22 | 24% | 46% | 43% | 56% |
| 25-Mar-22 | -24 | 23% | 47% | 42% | 57% |
| 24-Mar-22 | -26 | 22% | 48% | 41% | 58% |
| 23-Mar-22 | -25 | 22% | 47% | 42% | 57% |
| 22-Mar-22 | -26 | 21% | 47% | 41% | 58% |
| 21-Mar-22 | -28 | 21% | 49% | 40% | 58% |
| 18-Mar-22 | -30 | 20% | 50% | 38% | 60% |
| 17-Mar-22 | -26 | 21% | 47% | 41% | 58% |
| 16-Mar-22 | -24 | 21% | 45% | 42% | 57% |
| 15-Mar-22 | -25 | 21% | 46% | 42% | 56% |
| 14-Mar-22 | -30 | 20% | 50% | 40% | 58% |
| 11-Mar-22 | -26 | 22% | 48% | 41% | 58% |
| 10-Mar-22 | -29 | 21% | 50% | 39% | 60% |
| 09-Mar-22 | -26 | 22% | 48% | 41% | 57% |
| 08-Mar-22 | -28 | 21% | 49% | 41% | 58% |
| 07-Mar-22 | -22 | 23% | 45% | 44% | 54% |
| 04-Mar-22 | -21 | 24% | 45% | 42% | 55% |
| 03-Mar-22 | -20 | 25% | 45% | 44% | 54% |
| 02-Mar-22 | -23 | 24% | 47% | 42% | 56% |
They still suck but if it makes you feel better he has improved a couple of points.
Has anyone had difficulty with sample data lately? Used to be, Quinnipiac would tell me 689 Democrat respondents, 354 Republicans and 156 Independents. Trump low approval. I don't seem to get such break downs any longer. About 3 months ago, Quinnipiac didn't even ask what I am.
A whole lot better than that one poll you had to rush over to this board and share, aren't they?
