ADVERTISEMENT

Been jammin

HighStickHarry

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
Apr 21, 2006
36,389
46,062
113
Here is a long video from a cia whistleblower. You can watch ten minutes at a time if you want, no rush. It will take great effort to dismiss this information but if anyone can do it, it would be you.

I’m not endorsing this, I’m not saying it’s true I’m just offering you the opportunity to consume direct information from someone who was in the swamp and has now crawled out.


 
Here is a long video from a cia whistleblower. You can watch ten minutes at a time if you want, no rush. It will take great effort to dismiss this information but if anyone can do it, it would be you.

I’m not endorsing this, I’m not saying it’s true I’m just offering you the opportunity to consume direct information from someone who was in the swamp and has now crawled out.



Rolling-my-eyes-gif1.gif
 
I managed to make it through 40 minutes of the video before I checked out. He about lost me when he referred to Nunez as a hero, but I powered through that and stuck with it for a while longer. I will say that some of what he claims may be accurate, but I think the majority is BS.

Here are some of my issues with his claims.

-If what he claims is true, the conspiracy involves hundreds of thousands of individuals. There would be more whistle blowers out there sharing information with the public. There would be individuals who feel compelled to reveal the truth because they are patriots. There would be individuals out there looking to find ways to monetize their information. There would be individuals out there who get off on knowing the details of a huge conspiracy, when no one else does, who would not be able to keep their mouth shut. People in foreign countries (intelligence operatives/bankers) would be able to talk about what they know without having to worry about being punished by the federal government.

-His claims assume that no rookie congressman would have enough morals to say, "f. you, I'm not going along with this". And no judge would have the ethics to not go along with the conspiracy.

-Now is the part where you tell me that everyone is keeping quiet due to fear of retaliation. Well, Shipp is blowing the whole "conspiracy" out of the water, and he isn't hiding on foreign soil in a walled compound. He doesn't have a security detail shadowing him.

IMO, he is looking to make money by taking advantage of individuals who are prone to buying this type of BS.
 
I managed to make it through 40 minutes of the video before I checked out. He about lost me when he referred to Nunez as a hero, but I powered through that and stuck with it for a while longer. I will say that some of what he claims may be accurate, but I think the majority is BS.

Here are some of my issues with his claims.

-If what he claims is true, the conspiracy involves hundreds of thousands of individuals. There would be more whistle blowers out there sharing information with the public. There would be individuals who feel compelled to reveal the truth because they are patriots. There would be individuals out there looking to find ways to monetize their information. There would be individuals out there who get off on knowing the details of a huge conspiracy, when no one else does, who would not be able to keep their mouth shut. People in foreign countries (intelligence operatives/bankers) would be able to talk about what they know without having to worry about being punished by the federal government.

-His claims assume that no rookie congressman would have enough morals to say, "f. you, I'm not going along with this". And no judge would have the ethics to not go along with the conspiracy.

-Now is the part where you tell me that everyone is keeping quiet due to fear of retaliation. Well, Shipp is blowing the whole "conspiracy" out of the water, and he isn't hiding on foreign soil in a walled compound. He doesn't have a security detail shadowing him.

IMO, he is looking to make money by taking advantage of individuals who are prone to buying this type of BS.

So, exactly no difference than your sources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wyomingosualum
If I was more open minded, I might believe that the Earth is flat, the moon landing was staged, 911 was perpetrated by the U.S. government, and the Clintons have a secret island where they deal in human trafficking and pedophilia.

I wrote that before your breakdown. Thanks for exposing yourself.

My second sentence probably isn’t said much in general conversation.
 
Lol hmmm I don’t want to clarify now that I’ve read those two choices...

It’s one of those!
 
  • Like
Reactions: CowboyJD
Both

It stands to reason that only a certain demographic would be interested in attending his presentation. Common sense.

I’m interested in what the crowd did specifically that tipped you off.


Extremely close minded. Why do I listen to more liberal news than I do conservative news? Why do I watch rbg on cspan? I think we have proven your assumptions/stereo typing drive your thinking. Those people sought information. That’s it, that’s all you know.

I hope you don’t stereo type minorities like this with the overwhelming data that we know about their demographics.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT