Are Libs more comfortable with unethical behavior?

[CBradSmith]

Evidence seems to suggest...generally yes.

Why?

Deep down, is that a genetic thing?

I believe so, with 2 primary drivers....

They generally have a weaker locus of control.
Generally, they are comfortable with moral relativism.

 

[CBradSmith]

On the flip side, when you try to pin one down on whether there are any "absolutes," at first blush, you may say "they don't believe in absolutes."

However, I don't believe this to be true either.

They seem to believe that personal freedom is an absolute.*

 

[07pilt]

Evidence seems to suggest...generally yes.

Why?

Deep down, is that a genetic thing?

I believe so, with 2 primary drivers....

They generally have a weaker locus of control.
Generally, they are comfortable with moral relativism.

I think it has more to do with skull shape.

 

[CBradSmith]

I think it has more to do with skull shape.

Probably not.

 

[07pilt]

Probably not.

Perhaps you are right, it is genetic. Most Libs do come from slavic stock, and the slavs are notorious for their congenital moral weakness.

 

[CBradSmith]

Perhaps you are right, it is genetic. Most Libs do come from slavic stock, and the slavs are notorious for their congenital moral weakness.

Maybe

 

[CBradSmith]

Probably a notable lack of occipital bunning.

 

[PepeDeFrog29]

Perhaps you are right, it is genetic. Most Libs do come from slavic stock, and the slavs are notorious for their congenital moral weakness.

My goodness. You are acting like a complete buffoon. Well, hopefully it is an act.

 

[07pilt]

My goodness. You are acting like a complete buffoon. Well, hopefully it is an act.

Can't help it. Born this way. Locus of control.

 

[long-duc-dong]

I think it has more to do with skull shape.

How's it go.......ewwwwww burn.

 

[squeak]

Evidence seems to suggest...generally yes.

Why?

Deep down, is that a genetic thing?

I believe so, with 2 primary drivers....

They generally have a weaker locus of control.
Generally, they are comfortable with moral relativism.

I think it has to do with the fact that most dorks/geaks/betas/cucks grow up to be liberals.

 

[CBradSmith]

I think it has to do with the fact that most dorks/geaks/betas/cucks grow up to be liberals.

Somebody has to cut hair

 

[GunsOfFrankEaton]

What's with lefties and those lisps they speak with?'

 

[JimmyBob]

What's with lefties and those lisps they speak with?'

 

[shortbus]

I thought chest cavity was the defining metric.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

Losing 33,000 emails so awful, but 22,000,000 lost by a republican? No big deal.

Why?

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

If Benghazi is bad, how would you characterize the Iraq war?

 

[Medic007]

Losing 33,000 emails so awful, but 22,000,000 lost by a republican? No big deal.

Why?

This must be one of the unaware and compliant citizenry talking points for today. Most, if not all here think Bush was a shitty president. And he isn't running for president in 2016. Most people aren't going to screech and whine about something that is irrelevant to the current election. Please note I said most people.

There are a few differences between the two cases though. The Bush administration email scandal happened while he was president. That scandal wasn't publicly known when he ran for reelection. The Bush administration didn't destroy physical devices and use Bleachbit to destroy evidence after they were subpoenaed. In fact, the Obama administration was able to find and restore approximately 22,000,000 emails from the Bush administration as reported in 2009.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34419592/ns/politics/t/millions-missing-bush-admin-e-mails-found/
The Bush administration didn't rig an FBI investigation to keep him from being prosecuted while running for president.

Hope this helps. Now back to present.

 

[long-duc-dong]

If Benghazi is bad, how would you characterize the Iraq war?

Bad.

 

[Medic007]

If Benghazi is bad, how would you characterize the Iraq war?

Bad. Terrible. And your Queen voted for it.

It may be difficult for you unaware and compliant citizens to understand, but Benghazi isn't just about 4 Americans getting killed, lying about an internet video, and deleting emails. Those are just individual components of the entire Hillary Clinton Libya shitshow done in the name of "genocide." Maybe you should read stuff about Hillary's intervention in Libya that isn't from Hillary's propaganda department for the unaware and compliant. Her judgment and decision making made the collective of those in favor of the Iraq invasion look like geniuses.

And once again, Bush isn't running for president.

 

[MegaPoke]

Syskatine get out da Bushes!

1. Republicans aren't conservatives. Some are but it's far from interchangeable.

2. Nothing in common - sad that medic had to educate you on this.

3. Bush sucked and probably should be investigated, and if emails were part of it, fine and who gives a f?

4. The Iraq war is nothing compared to war with Russia.

 

[CBradSmith]

Bushes voting for Hilldawg

Next

 

[CBradSmith]

Bushes voting for Hilldawg

Next

How does it feel @syskatine to be arguing seemingly for that which you despise so much?

You can see it in your mind's-eye... W's and Hilldawgs faces merging into 1.

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

You can see it in your mind's-eye... W's and Hilldawgs faces merging into 1.

Cut that shit out.

 

[CBradSmith]

Cut that shit out.

Great response, actually!

 

[anon_xl72qcu5isp39]

Syskatine get out da Bushes!

1. Republicans aren't conservatives. Some are but it's far from interchangeable.

2. Nothing in common - sad that medic had to educate you on this.

3. Bush sucked and probably should be investigated, and if emails were part of it, fine and who gives a f?

4. The Iraq war is nothing compared to war with Russia.

1. Well they sure say they are. Sounded like it from the convention. Those aren't liberals up there at the RNC. Trump came from a Republican primary.

2. Except for hiding emails.

3. Everyone but conservatives. You people don't give a shit about corruption, honesty, decency or any of that. You put up with it and don't say a word when republicans do it. Bush doesn't get reelected otherwise. It's insane, the double standard. You faint if Hillary doesn't dot and "i" but give two shits if 22,000,000 under subpoena disappear.

4. We aren't at war with Russia. We didn't invade Russia. We talk with Russia and use diplomacy and ambassadors. Guys with teens of draft deferments engineered invading Iraq so thousands of people could die and be hurt, when they personally wouldn't dream of exposing themselves or their families to any harm. That's what happens when you enable pussies and give them power. You should learn from your mistakes.

 

[MegaPoke]

1. Well they sure say they are. Sounded like it from the convention. Those aren't liberals up there at the RNC. Trump came from a Republican primary. They are whores playing to a deceived base. Mostly, they are just globalist neocons like Hillary. Get smarter. There's one party, and we aren't invited.

2. Except for hiding emails. ooooh.... Probably Russia? Has anyone asked Sarah Palin?

3. Everyone but conservatives. You people don't give a shit about corruption, honesty, decency or any of that. You put up with it and don't say a word when republicans do it. Bush doesn't get reelected otherwise. It's insane, the double standard. You faint if Hillary doesn't dot and "i" but give two shits if 22,000,000 under subpoena disappear. The lack of awareness you have has got to be a troll. Also, wtf do you mean by you people? Racist.

4. We aren't at war with Russia yet. We didn't invade Russia. We talk with Russia and use diplomacy and ambassadors. Guys with teens of draft deferments engineered invading Iraq so thousands of people could die and be hurt, when they personally wouldn't dream of exposing themselves or their families to any harm. That's what happens when you enable pussies and give them power. You should learn from your mistakes.

Sweet sweet koolaid. shhh..... drink it down precious. Go to the light...