ADVERTISEMENT

Another right wing conspiracy theory

Does "Time" mean Time Magazine? I tell you what; if it does and you want anyone to believe that crap, please also post an "Info Wars" article that claimes the opposite. Fair enough?
 
Can you list any conspiracies I buy into?

I just explained to you a few days ago that I don’t believe or disbelieve any of these things. I discuss circumstances.

Or were you joking again?

I thought you were all in on the deep state. No?
 
Does "Time" mean Time Magazine? I tell you what; if it does and you want anyone to believe that crap, please also post an "Info Wars" article that claimes the opposite. Fair enough?

Lol...links to lawsuits against time?
 
Lol...links to lawsuits against time?

Toon, good grief, you are a smart guy but the "lol" crap all the time does not help your points.

Now, did I say anything about lawsuits on Time? Nope, but I am guessing you have info about lawsuits on Info Wars so please post them. I bet I have watched IW for about 15 min my entire life, but I used them because I know it is a bunch of BS just like Time.
 
I thought you were all in on the deep state. No?

That’s the problem. How do you and I define “deep state?” I start from the premise that I’m not in Washington so I have no idea.

I do think there are forces that influence/control events and it happens behind the scenes. I believe government workers play team politics and I also believe some of it is corrupt and vile. Our government in my opinion has been secretly killing people and threatening people since the beginning. Read what happened at pine ridge in the 70’s and the plight of Leonard peltier. Read up on what J Edgar Hoover did. Read up on the bush family. Read up on what the cia has been doing around the world. You are naive.
 
Last edited:
#sad

http://time.com/5356851/what-is-qanon/

Here's another one for you to buy into @HighStickHarry

Which is more sad

The entire MSM and those opposed to Trump buying the Russia collusion conspiracy whole sale and supporting a fake investigation. I mean, they think it’s real, but it’s not

Or a group of anons and others who believe there are active measures occurring to drain the swamp.

At least one wants to see bad people go down

The other just wants to burn a witch at the stake because feels

Fvckin pathetic
 
Which is more sad

The entire MSM and those opposed to Trump buying the Russia collusion conspiracy whole sale and supporting a fake investigation. I mean, they think it’s real, but it’s not

Or a group of anons and others who believe there are active measures occurring to drain the swamp.

At least one wants to see bad people go down

The other just wants to burn a witch at the stake because feels

Fvckin pathetic

Oh lord....
 
Of course it is real. I'm not sure you understand the difference between real and fake.

No, collusion is not real. It is a fake conspiracy which just happened to have enough people in power with TDS to buy in and get an actual investigation over a fake conspiracy.
 
The collusion is a conspiracy.

All you retards need to realize it’s no different than Qanon conspiracy.

Illegal spying on the opposition through false information provided in FISA’a

That’s real, been proven
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rdcldad
No, collusion is not real. It is a fake conspiracy which just happened to have enough people in power with TDS to buy in and get an actual investigation over a fake conspiracy.

You said the investigation is fake. But, the investigation is real. I guarantee you that an investigation is ongoing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davidallen

Yes, step away from CNN

Through freedom watch yesterday it appears that we also learned not only did the FBI know about the illegal servers with Hillary they allowed Huma to move her stuff over

The spying was illegal because the authorization was based on unverified and salacious claims to influence the judge to sign off

They attested under threat of perjury the information was verified and true

Spying based on false information does not become legal just because a judge signed off

Heads need to roll for that

And it’s sad as fvck that a bunch a Pussyhat sore fvckin losers can’t handle that their person lost
 
  • Like
Reactions: TPOKE and MegaPoke
Yes, step away from CNN

Through freedom watch yesterday it appears that we also learned not only did the FBI know about the illegal servers with Hillary they allowed Huma to move her stuff over

The spying was illegal because the authorization was based on unverified and salacious claims to influence the judge to sign off

They attested under threat of perjury the information was verified and true

Spying based on false information does not become legal just because a judge signed off

Heads need to roll for that

And it’s sad as fvck that a bunch a Pussyhat sore fvckin losers can’t handle that their person lost

They didn’t attest that the information was verified and true.

They attested that it came from a reliable source that they have used in the past.

Big difference there. YUGE difference.
 
Can you accept that approach with regards to Mueller’s investigation...authorized by a Trump appointee...as well?

I can...in both situations.

In fact, that’s what I have advocated for from the beginning.

Ditto
 
They didn’t attest that the information was verified and true.

They attested that it came from a reliable source that they have used in the past.

Big difference there. YUGE difference.

“Verified the application for accuracy in accordance with.....”

“Salacious and unverified”

And “reliable source”

Good to know that “salacious and unverified” information can be obtained from a “reliable source,” be “verified for accuracy in accordance with” procedure then used in a court to grant the ability to spy on, not only a US citizen but others via the two hop rule, and almost an entire campaign of the opposition party.

How people are defending this is insane

And the meeting with the Russian lawyer by DJT Jr. not a smart meeting to take for sure. But a set up which leads to why “opposition research” with foreign nationals was a-okay for Hillary but not members of BDD’s campaign.
 
Can you accept that approach with regards to Mueller’s investigation...authorized by a Trump appointee...as well?

I can...in both situations.

In fact, that’s what I have advocated for from the beginning.


I’ll be able to accept it if wrong doing is found. Like actual real wrong doing

I cannot accept an investigation based on conspiracy bullshit

To this day I do not understand Sessions insistance on RR
 
I initially accepted it

I do not now because I believe there’s enough information to show it is all a sham

I’ll be willing to accept it if real collusion is found and I was wrong

Fair enough?

So a no....because you’ve drawn your own conclusions before the investigation is done...but you leave a little door open to having your mind changed at the end?

That’s not exactly waiting until the end of these investigations to draw conclusions...which is what I have advocated...but you do you, brother. Just trying to get clear on where your head is at.
 
Last edited:
So a no....because you’ve drawn your own conclusions before the investigation is done...but you leave a little door open to having your mind changed at the end?

That’s not exactly waiting until the end of these investigations to draw conclusions...which is what I have advocated...but you do you, brother. Just trying to get clear on where your head is at.

My mind was changed based on information

It can be again

I believe that’s fair.

Innocent until proven guilty

And yes, I’m being hypocritical with my assignment of guilt to Obama while being more reasonable with Trump

I accept that hypocrisy for now

Best case scenario for the nation

I’m proven right with Trump and wrong with Obama. Which I’ll accept if a real investigation occurs. Not that phony BS they pulled with Hillary

And the MSM starts being held responsible for being nothing more than propaganda

And that includes conservative sources as well
 
  • Like
Reactions: SoonerRedYukon101
My mind was changed based on information

It can be again

I believe that’s fair.

Innocent until proven guilty

And yes, I’m being hypocritical with my assignment of guilt to Obama while being more reasonable with Trump

I accept that hypocrisy for now

Best case scenario for the nation

I’m proven right with Trump and wrong with Obama. Which I’ll accept if a real investigation occurs. Not that phony BS they pulled with Hillary

And the MSM starts being held responsible for being nothing more than propaganda

And that includes conservative sources as well

As long as you are comfortable with your own hypocrisy.....

Who am I to make a big deal about it?

Maybe shouldn’t go after others for their own “Russia, Russia, Russia, but Hillary/Obama hasn’t been proven to have done anything wrong” hypocrisy though...pot/kettle/all that. Just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
Which is more sad

The entire MSM and those opposed to Trump buying the Russia collusion conspiracy whole sale and supporting a fake investigation. I mean, they think it’s real, but it’s not

Or a group of anons and others who believe there are active measures occurring to drain the swamp.

At least one wants to see bad people go down

The other just wants to burn a witch at the stake because feels

Fvckin pathetic
Mueller-Conspiracy-600-LI.jpg
 
Don’t think it was a crime though

you and benjo were discussing willful ignorance and plausible deniability
in the cya aftermath of the fisa court steele dossier fiasco

that has led to the attorney for the president of the united states of america’s offices being searched via warrant issued in the southern district of new york

it’s an unimaginable scenario
an absolute and total bloodless coup

400m to mullahs employees known terrorist qasem soleimani and you don’t think it’s illegal


i’d love a chance to make that case



Qasem Soleimani major general of the quds force iranian revolutionary guard is listed by the United States as a known terrorist, which forbids U.S. citizens from doing business with him.


  1. "Designation of Iranian Entities and Individuals for Proliferation Activities and Support for Terrorism". United States Department of State. 25 October 2007. Archived from the original on 12 March 2008. Retrieved 7 April 2008.
 
you and benjo were discussing willful ignorance and plausible deniability
in the cya aftermath of the fisa court steele dossier fiasco

that has led to the attorney for the president of the united states of america’s offices being searched via warrant issued in the southern district of new york

it’s an unimaginable scenario
an absolute and total bloodless coup

400m to mullahs employees known terrorist qasem soleimani and you don’t think it’s illegal


i’d love a chance to make that case



Qasem Soleimani major general of the quds force iranian revolutionary guard is listed by the United States as a known terrorist, which forbids U.S. citizens from doing business with him.


  1. "Designation of Iranian Entities and Individuals for Proliferation Activities and Support for Terrorism". United States Department of State. 25 October 2007. Archived from the original on 12 March 2008. Retrieved 7 April 2008.

No, that was not what we were discussing, but thanks for your input.

Maybe go to law school...study hard...and you’ll get a chance to make that case. Until then, I’ll go with my knowledge, experience, and extensive training in what is an actual crime and what isn’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Been Jammin
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT