https://www.foxnews.com/science/the...-and-a-dead-supercontinent-is-partly-to-blame
Can someone who believes this is settled science reconcile these two sentences:
Right now, the ocean is in the midst of another sea level spike, thanks largely to manmade climate change (estimates vary, but sea levels will probably rise anywhere from 6 to 16 feet over the next century).
For comparison, the present-day sea level rise associated with climate change is about 0.1 inches (3.2 millimeters) a year.
These two statements are made in this one story. At .1 inches per year, you would get 10 inches or raised sea levels over the next 100 years. Yet the story says 6-16 feet is expected. That would require an 8x increase in MMGW impact over the next 100 years to achieve the minimum projection. I actually believe the scientist in the second quote. I just have a hard time extrapolating the projected impact given the current rate of change.
Can someone who believes this is settled science reconcile these two sentences:
Right now, the ocean is in the midst of another sea level spike, thanks largely to manmade climate change (estimates vary, but sea levels will probably rise anywhere from 6 to 16 feet over the next century).
For comparison, the present-day sea level rise associated with climate change is about 0.1 inches (3.2 millimeters) a year.
These two statements are made in this one story. At .1 inches per year, you would get 10 inches or raised sea levels over the next 100 years. Yet the story says 6-16 feet is expected. That would require an 8x increase in MMGW impact over the next 100 years to achieve the minimum projection. I actually believe the scientist in the second quote. I just have a hard time extrapolating the projected impact given the current rate of change.