An Example Of What A Complete Asshole DJT Is
- Thread starter Ponca Dan
- Start date
The outrage...you know multiple things can be happening at the same time right?
1) President Trump is an asshole
2) President Trump calls out Love - someone who has been outwardly vocal against him for his rhetoric...cool
3) She is behind in a state that President Trump won by 18%, and in the counties that make up the 4th Congressional District in Utah, President Trump dominated in those areas
4) Her family background story is amazing, and she's a pro-life conservative
I found a couple of quotes to be incredibly interesting "He’s going to fix abortion, people. Thoughtful, nuanced people of good will on both sides have debated and reasoned with each other for decades to no avail trying to solve an issue that pits women’s autonomy against the needs and the rights of the most vulnerable."
Who the hell is she talking about? Who are these nuanced people of good will debating with reason to solve this issue? It turns into a scream fest the second someone says "Abor..."
"A president who was actually serious about finding a "solution" to the abortion stalemate—whatever that means—might wish to have an ambassador for the cause who was passionate and eloquent and thoughtful and could present herself as a good-faith voice for those who might not have been born."
Well she can't be much of an ambassador for the cause when she doesn't get reelected can she? She didn't want his endorsement and she's likely not going to find enough votes to remain in her role.
1) President Trump is an asshole
2) President Trump calls out Love - someone who has been outwardly vocal against him for his rhetoric...cool
3) She is behind in a state that President Trump won by 18%, and in the counties that make up the 4th Congressional District in Utah, President Trump dominated in those areas
4) Her family background story is amazing, and she's a pro-life conservative
I found a couple of quotes to be incredibly interesting "He’s going to fix abortion, people. Thoughtful, nuanced people of good will on both sides have debated and reasoned with each other for decades to no avail trying to solve an issue that pits women’s autonomy against the needs and the rights of the most vulnerable."
Who the hell is she talking about? Who are these nuanced people of good will debating with reason to solve this issue? It turns into a scream fest the second someone says "Abor..."
"A president who was actually serious about finding a "solution" to the abortion stalemate—whatever that means—might wish to have an ambassador for the cause who was passionate and eloquent and thoughtful and could present herself as a good-faith voice for those who might not have been born."
Well she can't be much of an ambassador for the cause when she doesn't get reelected can she? She didn't want his endorsement and she's likely not going to find enough votes to remain in her role.
She lost....needs to STFU and go back to work if she really wants to "make a difference." This is where people always get tripped up its always someone else's fault and the weekly standard hasn't been a giant Trump fan either.
Trump can be an ahole no doubt about that and if he wasn't a giant one before he was elected he will surely leave one of the bigger ones in politics or business. Never have seen such an effort by both sides of the media, his own party members and losers to cast him in the worst light possible. No way he deserves a 92% hit rate in the media. He's done enough of what he said he would do to warrant some actual fair coverage.
Trump can be an ahole no doubt about that and if he wasn't a giant one before he was elected he will surely leave one of the bigger ones in politics or business. Never have seen such an effort by both sides of the media, his own party members and losers to cast him in the worst light possible. No way he deserves a 92% hit rate in the media. He's done enough of what he said he would do to warrant some actual fair coverage.
What does “actual fair coverage” look like to you? Hannity kissing his ass at a campaign rally?
I guess my point is it’s not very hard to cast him in the worst light possible. He is a giant asshole most of the time, and sometimes seems to delight in the fact. There was no need for him to gloat and ridicule members of his own party who lost an election and were suffering the emotional pain that caused. He seemed to take glee in their loss. Mia refused to be his lapdog. But she was (purportedly) on his team, at least in the same party, and she voted with him more often than not. I say purportedly because it is obvious the only “team” Trump cares about is himself. Give him what he wants every time he wants it or the hell with you. That’s his message. He will wind up doing to the Republican Party what Obama did to the Democrats. The last election is an indication of what is coming.
Is Jake Tapper too moderate for you?
The Hannity and Maddows of the world suck.
You understand Hannity isn’t a reporter, right? Actually, you probably don’t since you fully displayed your ignorance with not knowing what the fvck the job of a journalist is.
And the odds against you getting anything closely resembling an intelligent response are currently 100%, but carry on, lol, mmok, circle jerk, chicken-shit, cheddar biscuits, sedation..............
Look Trump is just a different cat, am sure he revels in being thought an ahole and doesn't even care that he is thought of as one. I agree he does give ample opportunity to roast him, but he has also done much of what he said he would do while running for office something that has not been covered at all by the pinkos on the left. Course how surprising should that be that nearly all of them voted for Hillary and donated cash to the same.
He's not going to wind up doing to the republicans what the ex-rodent in chief did to the democrats and there is a simple reason for that. The incoming D's, especially the committee heads are coming for him and will be loaded for bear. The vitriol and gridlock will be breathtaking and on top of that there will probably be at least 20 democrats running for president. The libs/dems will continually demonstrate they have no agenda other than "get Trump." All that will do is increase his odds of being re-elected and gaining more seats in congress. Think about this...in 2009 the ex-rodent in chief's party had a 60-40 advantage in the senate, when he left it was a Republican advantage 52-48 in the senate. In the house he came into office with and a 257 - 178 advantage, when he left it was 241 - 194 republican majority. There is no way that big of a reversal happens.
Mia lost as an incumbent which is incredibly hard to do (incumbents have something like a 92% re-election rate) so something she did in her campaign just didn't resonate and I doubt anything Trump did could have helped her. I didn't really track her race so don't know what she did good or bad but even with the built in advantage of being an incumbent she lost. She needs to exit stage right and move on with her life. Trump probably shouldn't have made an issue about it at all, but he has a point. Regrettably he did lose a ton of seats in the house (usually a very predictable outcome for mid-terms) but he also gained seats in the senate which has only been done 4 times in the last 100+ years, so something is going right. Next election he can run against the house and if they don't come up with an agenda he should be very successful at doing so. The senate though is where the rubber meats the road and without a majority+ there the long lasting meaningful changes he wants to see happen, won't.
I truly wish he would now turn a partial new leaf.....still needs to give the biased media hell at every turn, but needs to stop committing unforced errors. If and that's big if, he can do that he should be in good shape going forward. One thing you can be assured of though, even if he brings up a good point (or does something extraordinary), he will be crucified by the press and dims.
Last edited:
So you play off his negatives as a positive and then whaboutism the rest of the way lol...you can’t admit his faults or unkept promises. True useful idiot
