Ahmund Arbery
- Thread starter tlwwake
- Start date
Like I said, I'll definitely stop insulting toon. You've earned your spot at the bottom, "prosecutor."
Only someone dumber than toon would celebrate being dumber than toon, "prosecutor." But you keep doing you.
elololololololololol! Carry on.
You got me to admit that you were dumber than Toon. What more do you want, "prosecutor?"
Are you mad that you got me to admit that you're the biggest idiot on 24/7? Why? You demanded that I admit it, "prosecutor."
His mind is not functional. He's a left-wing Archie Bunker.
How may times in this thread did @my_2cents vent his racist thoughts and claim that two black men would be arrested immediately if they shot a white person?
In news just today....in my home town of Tulsa. It took 9 years for the shooters (both black men) to be arrested for killing a white women. And the detectives knew the two probably did it for several years.
https://www.tulsaworld.com/news/loc...cle_bdf94217-5f2e-52be-8f70-ef9dea18d59c.html
That isn't what I claimed. I claimed if two black men shot a white jogger like these two white men did, they would have been arrested on the scene instead of let go.
Stop misrepresenting my claims.
From the article...
"Gunned down at a midtown gas station, the clerk's killing three days before Christmas was a classic "whodunit," police said. The two robbers, masked and gloved, were caught only on surveillance footage."
The Arbery case is not a classic whodunit. The police knew who did it the minute they arrived on scene.
You just keep flailing around cable.
Last edited:
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11609610/dead-couple-identified-delaware-veterans-cemetary-police/
Notice all the coverage the above got?????? The Georgia deal was incredibly stupid and sad. But reading both stories you can see where the media wants to drive any story once it sees the light of day. Almost impossible to find pictures of the deceased elderly couple. Just spitballing for a segment of the board. If this had been a white moron killing an elderly black couple what would be going on now?
cableok, the First 48 is a very interesting series and the Tulsa group is as amazing as they say.
Notice all the coverage the above got?????? The Georgia deal was incredibly stupid and sad. But reading both stories you can see where the media wants to drive any story once it sees the light of day. Almost impossible to find pictures of the deceased elderly couple. Just spitballing for a segment of the board. If this had been a white moron killing an elderly black couple what would be going on now?
cableok, the First 48 is a very interesting series and the Tulsa group is as amazing as they say.
You backpeddle fast!!
The Tulsa police identified the two killers six years ago.
* homicide detectives have "relentlessly pursued" the two for the past several years. From TulsaWorld.com
*. “Detective Jason White from Tulsa's Homicide Unit says Hamstard was named as a possible suspect early on”. From kjrh.com
* “Detectives said they interviewed several people over the years, who said Hamstard admitted to shooting Peggy Gaytan.” “In 2013, Detectives interviewed both Thomas and Hamstard” from newson6.com
You attempted to make-up facts about the Arbery case and you failed miserably. Now you silly assertion wasn’t proven untrue by someone googling and finding a random story, but a story today in Tulsa with similar situations.
Last edited:
And the murder took place nine years ago.
lol, no, the two cases are not "similar situations." What in the world are you even talking about?
I would encourage you to give it a rest because you are looking foolish right now, but I doubt you will.
very interesting discussion about the Arbery case with Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) in this video which starts at the 31:00 minute mark... (the earlier part of the video is on Covid 19)
Candid thoughts on Ahmad Aubrey...
https://theresurgent.com/2020/05/12/candid-thoughts-on-ahmad-aubrey/
https://theresurgent.com/2020/05/12/candid-thoughts-on-ahmad-aubrey/
I am guessing you didn’t listen to this did you? He speaks for nearly 5 minutes and nearly everything he said was said by people arguing against you in this thread.
Erickson is saying people should not be vilifying the victim. Erickson is saying that going into a construction site is not a reason to die. Erickson is saying that McMichael should not have chased after the victim and shot him.
He is right. I hope you were not posting that because you disagree with what he said. Are you posting this because you are a “prosecutor” and feel you need to disclose evidence to us that goes against your postings?
No one on this thread is going after Arbery. The only person making wild accusations is your attempts of being divisive by race-baiting.
Then maybe I misunderstood your post. I thought you were posting this as an argument against other’s posts.
White man runs 2.23 miles while holding a flat-screen TV...
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...he-ran-223-miles-with-flat-screen-tv-in-viral
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...he-ran-223-miles-with-flat-screen-tv-in-viral
Last edited:
@my_2cents - you seem to know if attacks are racial related even without publicly available facts?
Was this attack race related?
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/man-slash...ngry-over-112531972--abc-news-topstories.html
Was this attack race related?
https://www.yahoo.com/gma/man-slash...ngry-over-112531972--abc-news-topstories.html
@my_2cents. For some reason this story is hard to locate in the media? Hmmmm
There is a difference between “seeing racial factors,” which almost everybody “sees,” and contributing those “racial factors” as the primary motive for the murder. You are trying to walk a fine line. On the one hand you seem to insist the “racial factors” must be taken into account. But when you are called on it you claim that’s not what you are saying.
The kid was murdered. That’s all any of us need to know or see. Your attempt to insert racism into the equation is immaterial, at least it should be. Your attempt to widen the racial divide on this board (and in this country) should prohibit you from having a position as a prosecutor, if, indeed, you are.
I heard the guy that captured the shooting on video has been arrested and charged with murder. Seems kind of silly to charge a guy with murder for videoing what took place but maybe there is more to the story. Anyone know?
You don't believe that guy driving behind the jogger that filmed the crime just 'happened to pass by' at that very moment do you? Notice, you don't actually see any part of the video where the guy wasn't ALREADY on camera. How long had he followed the "jogger" filming him prior to the altercation?
If he is arrested for murder I would have to assume he was in on the scheme and filming it as a stand your ground defense.
I have not paid much attention to the case and had no idea who the guy that videoed the case was. I just heard he was being charged with murder and found that odd. As to the part of not seeing him in the video, the MSM is famous for showing parts of clips to stir up the ignorant.
Back to my question, are they saying this guy was part of setting this guy up to murder him? If so I think this maybe another case of overcharging to try and pacify the overly emotional. No way a murder charge sticks against him.
Odd. This person who assaulted the elderly person has still not been charged. Even though it is on video. And this person has a history of assault.
But I don’t see people protesting and marching for the person to be charged. And I don’t see this story much in the media.
What type of privilege is this called? I need help from the SJWs on the board.
