ABC's Karl: Sources Say Mueller Report is 'Almost Certain to Be Anti-Climactic'
- Thread starter SoonerRedYukon101
- Start date
Oh shit! Jonathan Karl is a Russian! Do not click the link! Russian Bots have taken over Jonathan Karl! Putin owns Jonathan Karl!
I don't know, guys. Should I believe Jonathan Karl and his sources or CowboyUp?
Decisions.
Decisions.
Wait for the General of the Foil Cap Brigade to respond. @Pokeabear, is Jonathan Karl a Russian?
Mueller investigation was nothing more than a maneuver to gain access to everything outside of Russian collusion. They knew going in they weren't going to find anything. If they were so concerned an investigation into Hillary would be underway.
good ole $50M no scope mueller
after rolling snake eyes
he’s bloodless coup mueller
all the “let the truth prevail” sheople
never account for the cost
after rolling snake eyes
he’s bloodless coup mueller
all the “let the truth prevail” sheople
never account for the cost
100% should be made public
every damn document
every second of time billed to the american taxpayer should be fully disclosed
Agreed. But I won't be surprised if absolutely nothing is ever released. You know, "serious national security concerns" and so on and so forth, etc., etc., etc.
Last edited:
Speaking of clutching at pearls lol...I wasn’t aware Jonathan Karl was privy to Mueller reports haha
oh it’s a no doubt treasure trove of
“sources and methods”
everybody gets a shade tree
Or...
and I'm just spitballing crazy shit here...
...but what if "witch hunt" really meant this the whole time?
On a scale of 1-10 how funny would that be?
Or...
and I'm just spitballing crazy shit here...
...but what if "witch hunt" really meant this the whole time?
On a scale of 1-10 how funny would that be?
You should probably stick with the truth. Truth: Trump echoing Nixonian dismissal tactics.
Oh man, I know. I should stick with the truth. Thanks!
You’re welcome. I mean...I’d go along with your idea if any one of his “witch hunt” tweets weren’t a direct attack on mueller and instead were a quip at Hillary’s witch hat ***shrugs shoulders ***
Barr said numerous times in his Senate hearings today that the Mueller report will not be made public. It cannot by law and the Special Counsel rules. Barr will be given the report and he will determine what he can release in synopsis form and what by statute cannot be released. Among the things which cannot be released are names of people recommended for prosecution and those who are declined for prosecution.
Still.... there is Trump appointee Rod Rosenstein's "scope memo" that could've (arguably) opened Meuller's scope up to include God knows what. Maybe (and I know this is crazy) even potential FISA abuse, spying on a duly elected president, manufacturing material for impeachment etc. Crazy conspiracy right? But... man there are a lot of FBI people that have been fired and/or removed from the public eye over that. I mean, just today I read that former FBI lawyer Jim Baker is the subject of a criminal media leak probe. And viewed through the prism that this will all be public knowledge, the recent NYT article *could* to some crazy right wingers look a lot like the FBI trying to cover their ass and explain why they were pulling some J Edgar Hoover bullshit and spying on an elected president as retribution for firing Comey rather than for actual cause - even though.... you know, they didn't find anything or Trump would've been taken down already. I mean, that's what a crazy person might think.
Last edited:
Similar threads
