Is intervention worth the cost?
https://www.fff.org/2017/05/24/question-every-parent-u-s-foreign-interventionism-worth/
https://www.fff.org/2017/05/24/question-every-parent-u-s-foreign-interventionism-worth/
Nope. There is another thread on this, but it's under fashion...Is intervention worth the cost?
https://www.fff.org/2017/05/24/question-every-parent-u-s-foreign-interventionism-worth/
Is intervention worth the cost?
https://www.fff.org/2017/05/24/question-every-parent-u-s-foreign-interventionism-worth/
I've been thinking about this a little bit. Question: why did the Allies decide to open Isreal to Jewish settlement in the first place? When was it, 1947, 1948? Why didn't the USA take them in? There were less than a million of them, I believe. 850,000 +/-. The population of the US in 1948 was under 150 million. We certainly had room for them. And when you see how they have turned that desert into an oasis you have to wonder what advancement/treasure they might have given us in the last 70 years. And think of the treasure we have expended on protecting Isreal, what we could have saved. There would be no reason for the ME countries to turn to terrorism. We wouldn't be seeing the mass migrations we're witnessing. How much better off the world would be today if the USA had taken them in instead of dropping them in the middle of hostile territory. What a shame. Why didn't we do it? Antisemitism?
Interventionism - as in regime change is not worth it.
Interventionism - as in anything up to and including literally nuking ISIS is worth it. In modern history there has never been a clearer side of history to be on including WW2.
This is not where they wanted to come and after not destroying the death camps during WW II the world owed them a homeland.I've been thinking about this a little bit. Question: why did the Allies decide to open Isreal to Jewish settlement in the first place? When was it, 1947, 1948? Why didn't the USA take them in? There were less than a million of them, I believe. 850,000 +/-. The population of the US in 1948 was under 150 million. We certainly had room for them. And when you see how they have turned that desert into an oasis you have to wonder what advancement/treasure they might have given us in the last 70 years. And think of the treasure we have expended on protecting Isreal, what we could have saved. There would be no reason for the ME countries to turn to terrorism. We wouldn't be seeing the mass migrations we're witnessing. How much better off the world would be today if the USA had taken them in instead of dropping them in the middle of hostile territory. What a shame. Why didn't we do it? Antisemitism?
You might want to read this.Interventionism - as in regime change is not worth it.
Interventionism - as in anything up to and including literally nuking ISIS is worth it. In modern history there has never been a clearer side of history to be on including WW2.
I'm sure the people of Wyoming would have appreciated your dad's generosity! (Blue)Yeah, but Zionism...
I think a very bad understanding of Christian scripture and antisemitism both had a lot to do with it.
My dad always said we should have just invited them all to live in Wyoming.
I'm sure the people of Wyoming would have appreciated your dad's generosity! (Blue)
Thanks! Now if I can just learn to put it to use.Just FYI, it is easy to make a post blue. At the top of the window where you are typing a post, you will see a B for bold, I for Italics and U for underline. Just to the right is a teardrop, which allows you to change font color.
Were the zionists motivated by the territory because of its sacred meaning?
Yeah, but Zionism...
I think a very bad understanding of Christian scripture and antisemitism both had a lot to do with it.
My dad always said we should have just invited them all to live in Wyoming.
Amiright in assuming you believe that letting them run amok is preferable to bombing them?You bomb people, people get angry.
So people bomb you, you get angry.
So you bomb people, people get angry.
So people bomb you, ........
I've been thinking about this a little bit. Question: why did the Allies decide to open Isreal to Jewish settlement in the first place? When was it, 1947, 1948? Why didn't the USA take them in? There were less than a million of them, I believe. 850,000 +/-. The population of the US in 1948 was under 150 million. We certainly had room for them. And when you see how they have turned that desert into an oasis you have to wonder what advancement/treasure they might have given us in the last 70 years. And think of the treasure we have expended on protecting Isreal, what we could have saved. There would be no reason for the ME countries to turn to terrorism. We wouldn't be seeing the mass migrations we're witnessing. How much better off the world would be today if the USA had taken them in instead of dropping them in the middle of hostile territory. What a shame. Why didn't we do it? Antisemitism?
Amiright in assuming you believe that letting them run amok is preferable to bombing them?
So did Bill Clinton.
My knowledge of history also only extends only as far back as the Clinton administration, so I can also say that 9/11 definitely happened because we didn't ever intervene in the Middle East before 9/11.Amiright in assuming you believe that letting them run amok is preferable to bombing them?
So did Bill Clinton.
4. Evangelical Christian vote.I think that our historic support of Israel is: 1. Good american politics (jewish vote) and 2. Post WWII commitment, and 3. Muslim terrorism reinforces instead of weakens that link. It's hard not to feel sorry for the enemy of your enemy. Israel never flew airplanes into our buildings.
Amiright in assuming you believe that letting them run amok is preferable to bombing them?
So did Bill Clinton.
I thought Clinton did bomb them in 99 or 2000.