ADVERTISEMENT

A new new world order?

MegaPoke

Moderator
Moderator
May 29, 2001
58,299
56,117
113
54
Tulsa
www.shipmanphotos.com
Interesting read. Would be interested in some discussion on what David Brooks thinks Trump's big picture foreign policy may look like - in a PBS interview.

"On Friday’s broadcast of “PBS NewsHour,” New York Times columnist David Brooks stated President-Elect Donald Trump seems “to have no respect for the institutions that were created after World War II,” and doesn’t agree with US foreign policy “based on the post-World War II institutions, that believed in [a] democratic, global world, which Russia and the Soviet Union was often seen as hostile to.”

"Brooks said, “[T]he thing that should most concern us is a shift in American foreign policy. We’ve had a bipartisan belief in American foreign policy, based on the post-World War II institutions, that believed in [a] democratic, global world, which Russia and the Soviet Union was often seen as hostile to. And most Republicans and Democrats have always basically believed in this world order. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and maybe Marine Le Pen do not agree with this basic structure of the world. They seem to have no respect for the institutions that were created after World War II, and they see a potential alliance of populists around the world, who would fight Islam and restore a certain semblance of traditional values. And so, we could be seeing a pivot in American foreign policy that may be on the mind of Donald Trump, certainly seems to be on the mind of Steve Bannon, his ideologist. And this is a piece of that larger shift.”P

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017...ons-that-believed-in-democratic-global-world/
 
If globalists don't see the core of American manhood shot to pieces or returning from abroad in body bags they are not happy. They'd rather remove these men from society, from being husbands and fathers and leaders in our country, under the auspices of making the world a better place when, in fact, they bring only more turmoil to it. Like in the middle east.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
If globalists don't see the core of American manhood shot to pieces or returning from abroad in body bags they are not happy. They'd rather remove these men from society, from being husbands and fathers and leaders in our country, under the auspices of making the world a better place when, in fact, they bring only more turmoil to it. Like in the middle east.
That is an amazing boogey man you have concocted there...
 
But it's not even close to a "democratic, global world." There is no equity in letting dictatorships or corrupt governments enter into deals they in no way will abide in and them claim victory.

The League of Nations failed as will The UN (IMHO it's already failed). The UN isn't democratic, is corrupt and can't do the job it was created to do. Why anyone would continue to support them or their world outlook should cause lots of angst. Honestly, the people of Rwanda would like to know how can you respect an organization that can't even fulfill it primary mission?

Screw globalization, NWO and the rush to collapse the western democracies that sacrificed millions in two world wars.
 
Last edited:
But it's not even close to a "democratic, global world." There is equity in letting dictatorships or corrupt governments enter into deals they in no way will abide in and them claim victory.

The League of Nations failed as will The UN (IMHO it's already failed). The UN isn't democratic, is corrupt and can't do the job it was created to do. Why anyone would continue to support them or their world outlook should cause lots of angst. Honestly, the people of Rwanda would like to know how can you respect an organization that can't even fulfill it primary mission?

Screw globalization, NWO and the rush to collapse the western democracies that sacrificed millions in two world wars.
Very well said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Medic007
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT