A Good Indicatior...

[Marshal Jim Duncan]

McConnell has the votes.

 

[imprimis]

I'm not buying that for a minute, er, second. Sen. Jones from Alabama said he would be somewhat of a conservative democrat and has voted not to confirm Kavanaugh.

 

[CBradSmith]

McConnell has the votes.

View embedded media

And that the fallout in the polls is believed to be accurate.

 

[purkey]

Looks like he’s playing to both sides a bit.

 

[100TonsofOrangeFury]

Apparently he's disgusted by the kid gloves treatment and unanimous praise she's received since spouting "truths" from 40 years ago.

Hate to hear what he'd think if they treated her like the hostile witness she is.

 

[N. Pappagiorgio]

 

[Rdcldad]

more temperment

 

[imprimis]

Murkowski begged Trump to open ANWR for drilling to help her state. Yet, she's willing to vote against Kavanaugh and keep the SCOTUS at a 4-4 split which let's decisions by the 9th Circus Court of Appeals continue to screw the citizens of her state.

 

[Marshal Jim Duncan]

Murkowski begged Trump to open ANWR for drilling to help her state. Yet, she's willing to vote against Kavanaugh and keep the SCOTUS at a 4-4 split which let's decisions by the 9th Circus Court of Appeals continue to screw the citizens of her state.

She has always been a bit of a dim bulb.

 

[JimmyBob]

She has always been a bit of a dim bulb.

In Creek County, that would be dumb bitch!

 

[aix_xpert]

Murkowski begged Trump to open ANWR for drilling to help her state. Yet, she's willing to vote against Kavanaugh and keep the SCOTUS at a 4-4 split which let's decisions by the 9th Circus Court of Appeals continue to screw the citizens of her state.

At least she didn't hide behind the allegations. She stated that she was against him due to specific votes and policies she thought were not favorable to her state. That is a fair criticism and a valid reason to vote no against an SCJ. I don't agree with her position, but its a valid position.

 

[trapped_in_tx]

At least she didn't hide behind the allegations. She stated that she was against him due to specific votes and policies she thought were not favorable to her state. That is a fair criticism and a valid reason to vote no against an SCJ. I don't agree with her position, but its a valid position.

I agree with you that's is good she owned her position.

However, if there are votes and policies by Kavanaugh that align more closely to the US Constitution than to the interests of her State, then she just comes across as butthurt.

I don't know if that's the case; I'm saying that her criticism of Kavanaugh can only be 'fair' with caveats.