ok are you saying there are not any stupid democrats? This is the childish crap that annoys me about people. This has nothing to do with anything. Nice try though little troll. IMO you are no better then Trump.
I'm shocked that a democratic polling company would find such results.
It takes a special blend of mean and ignorant to think a fictional city needs bombed. That 30% probably agrees with 95% of your political beliefs, too. Don't get mad at me or the pollster, change your opinions so you're not always on the same side as fools.
+ Paul RyanNEW POLL JUST IN:
OVER 90% OF DEMOCRATS BELIEVE IN OBAMA CLAUS.
Ha! Except.... the santa and bill of rights gibes aren't real, are they? Unfortunately, 30% of republicans really are so mean and stupid they're up for bombing something they've never heard of.
The Bill of Rights jibes aren't real? On what planet do you live?Ha! Except.... the santa and bill of rights gibes aren't real, are they? Unfortunately, 30% of republicans really are so mean and stupid they're up for bombing something they've never heard of.
Ha! Except.... the santa and bill of rights gibes aren't real, are they? Unfortunately, 30% of republicans really are so mean and stupid they're up for bombing something they've never heard of.
This is what syster isn't telling us.
Fifty-five percent of Democrats believed the city exists, while only 43 percent of Republicans thought it was real.
See if you responded either no or yes to the question then you believed the city was real.
I would bet that you could take a real city in Syria, like Al Hasaka and ask if it was a real city and the majority of Americans would not know.
This fake poll question is nothing more than a desperate attempt by a left wing rag to embarrass Republicans and it actually back fired.
It's so disingenuous. Use an Arabic sounding name, ask if it should be bombed which explicitly implies there are terrorists there.Right. It sounds sort of Arabic, so it's probably a city in the Middle East. The big divergence is the two reactions from there: 1. I haven't heard of it, so I'd better hold off on killing people there.
2. I don't know, so let's kill them.
Take a wild guess what 30% of republicans think. That's their thought process.
which explicitly implies
Not reaching at all... now it's explicit implications.
We foster and adopt unwanted children.
That's putting your money where your mouth is.
Yes explicit. The people answering the questions thought they were talking to legitimate pollsters therefore they just assumed no honest pollster would ask about bombing a fictional city and they wouldn't ask about bombing a city that didn't have terrorists.Not reaching at all... now it's explicit implications.
And the disheveled left sycophants gobble it it up and gimp prance around like it actually means anything. They are so starved for something to actually go their way after watching their shitty party unravel the past few years that they'll make up shit to celebrate. Once the "Blame Bush" lost its luster, they've been empty handed since.Yes explicit. The people answering the questions thought they were talking to legitimate pollsters therefore they just assumed no honest pollster would ask about bombing a fictional city and they wouldn't ask about bombing a city that didn't have terrorists.
But a slimy, dishonest Democrat operative would lie and ask about a fictional city.
Yes explicit. The people answering the questions thought they were talking to legitimate pollsters therefore they just assumed no honest pollster would ask about bombing a fictional city and they wouldn't ask about bombing a city that didn't have terrorists.
But a slimy, dishonest Democrat operative would lie and ask about a fictional city.
True. Why do you liberals keep writing the best jokes about yourselves? Crap, even the hardcore conservatives can't get a decent joke in about liberals.Must get old, always being the punchline.
Oh how that hurts. You got me.Must get old, always being the punchline.
Actually the Yale thing is something to be bothered by. They weren't asked about abolishing a fake Bill of Rights item.Is this similar to the Yale students signing a fake petition to do away with the 1A?
It's just a philosophical extension of a pro-life conviction.
If we truly believe in life and want to see children live -- what do we do with unwanted orphan children?