ADVERTISEMENT

‘Media Reporting’ Is Now Just More Censorship And Suppression Of Information

OrangeTuono

Starter
Gold Member
Nov 27, 2023
1,050
1,061
113
As the left-wing Media Matters for America buckles under the weight of a delightfully crushing defamation lawsuit brought by Elon Musk — hope he wins! — it’s probably a good time for that trash outlet’s deep-pocket donors to consider spending their money elsewhere; not just because MMFA is a satanic organization that employs a bunch of otherwise unskilled dopes, but because so much of what was formerly known as “media reporting” is now simply more censorship and suppression of right-wingers, which is exactly what MMFA does.


Politico on Friday ran a lengthy article about Tucker Carlson featuring this revealing quote by the Washington Post’s Erik Wemple: “I wrote about him when he was at Fox News for the simple reason that Tucker had bosses,” said Wemple. “And those bosses weren’t accountable. They weren’t really journalists, as we discovered in the Dominion suit. But they were sensitive to criticism, and my role as a media critic was to play all this stuff out and seek accountability from Fox and seek explanations from Fox.”



 
The MSM is one of the biggest enemies to truth and freedom of speech in this country. Hopefully Trump wins the presidency and whoever his press secretary is will confront these reporters with their own words and demand accountability from them.
With the DNC election funding for political advertisements, MSM is dying a not so slow death.
They're getting their asses handed to them in defamation suits one after another, and likely many many that we don't hear about. Even the NY/DC law firms can save them from their lies.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ClintonDavidScott
“Musk has suffered setbacks in similar cases. In March, a federal judge in California reprimanded X and tossed out a lawsuit it had filed against another watchdog group, the Center for Countering Digital Hate. In a blistering 52-page order, the judge blasted that case as plainly punitive rather than about protecting the platform’s security and legal rights.

“Sometimes it is unclear what is driving a litigation,” wrote District Judge Charles Breyer, of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, in the order’s opening lines. “Other times, a complaint is so unabashedly and vociferously about one thing that there can be no mistaking that purpose.”

“This case represents the latter circumstance,” Breyer continued. “This case is about punishing the Defendants for their speech.”




Good luck @OrangeTuono lol




carry on
 
“Musk has suffered setbacks in similar cases. In March, a federal judge in California reprimanded X and tossed out a lawsuit it had filed against another watchdog group, the Center for Countering Digital Hate. In a blistering 52-page order, the judge blasted that case as plainly punitive rather than about protecting the platform’s security and legal rights.

“Sometimes it is unclear what is driving a litigation,” wrote District Judge Charles Breyer, of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, in the order’s opening lines. “Other times, a complaint is so unabashedly and vociferously about one thing that there can be no mistaking that purpose.”

“This case represents the latter circumstance,” Breyer continued. “This case is about punishing the Defendants for their speech.”




Good luck @OrangeTuono lol




carry on

Free blunts delivered to your door...

Tommy Chong Weed GIF by Paramount Movies
 
  • Like
Reactions: ClintonDavidScott
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT