"Progressive" thought process
- Thread starter BIGOSUFAN
- Start date
Here are some pics of s miscarried 12-week old human. Has ten fingers, ten toes, rib cage intact, distinct eyes, nose and mouth. And sucking its own thumb.....but not a human being according to the "progressives."
This post was edited on 4/2 12:38 PM by BIGOSUFAN
12-week old "fetus"
This post was edited on 4/2 12:38 PM by BIGOSUFAN
12-week old "fetus"
Says the the person ostensibly so concerned about the systematic murder of millions of babies that he or she can muster up the courage to discuss it on an OSU sports website. Typically, that's what people do about the murder of millions of babies, post about it.
It's the sex.
Throwing the 'you're a liberal' label just doesn't work on this issue.
The self-described most conservative candidate running for president for years is a HUGE fan of Ayn Rand. He recommends everyone buy her works.
The question is, how could someone as brilliant as him leave out her very clear and specific views on abortion?
No, Sys, Pilt deflected, dropping in a new "frame" hoping people would swallow it.. It's not about "sex should have consequences" at all. What an absurd and empty statement. Even more absurd that someone like Pilt said it thinking it was grounded, but not so absurd that a mouthbreather like you buys it.
From the intellectual leader of the modern GOP:
"The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand," Paul Ryan said in a 2005 speech. "I grew up reading Ayn Rand and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are It's inspired me so much that it's required reading in my office for all my interns and my staff."
"The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand," Paul Ryan said in a 2005 speech. "I grew up reading Ayn Rand and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are It's inspired me so much that it's required reading in my office for all my interns and my staff."
A. Paul Ryan isn't "the intellectual leader of the modern GOP"
B. One can admire someone else's philopsophies or thinking, and even be inspired by them, without swallowing or adhering to every single tenet they espouse. That's the difference between admiration and cult worship.
I'm surprised te left is pro abortion, considering the womb is more dangerous than the street for black people.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted from Rivals Mobile
While both parties have their sun worshippers, the left, in general, seems particularly bad at what you've mentioned due to much of their need to be guided by how something feels. Challenging their worldviews is cumbersome and scary. For all but a few their avoidance of a self-check system hollows out their intellectual credibility.
Yeah, I agree with this. Especially when it comes to the modern 2010s left and Islam, mass immigration and political correctness / freedom of speech. Modern left wing progressives are pretty f*cking off the rails on a lot of issues......and you are right, a lot of it is driven by feelings.
I highly suggest taking 10 minutes and reading this article on social justice warriors. There are a lot of forces working against modern men, and this really sums it up with specific examples.
I'm honestly with the Libertarian right on 80%+ issues. Abortion and social issues is where the American right loses me, as they made a disastrous decision to link themselves to a religion......which of course is hurting it now and only going get worse.
This post was edited on 4/2 4:08 PM by NZ Poke
NZ I like the part titled "SJW’s are sexually confused and admittedly mentally ill" the best.
Thank you for posting that link.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Thank you for posting that link.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Nothing funny about segregation, miscegenation, antisemitism, sexism, etc... all of which have been defended at one time or another with an appeal to religious freedom.
You prove the fallacy of religious objective morality with these types of arguments. Just how many things that we recognize as immoral were conceived by, defended or promulgated by the church?
Please provide examples of "things that we recognize as immoral" that were conceived by the Church.
Ironic you mention that, given that "progressives" encourage behavior which is the best known vector for HIV transmission (the act of sodomy).
1. Actually, it's not at all ironic. Several african countries' stone-age/biblical-type laws about homosexuality has been pretty well publicized, but Aids is still a big problem, apparently. Public health organizations (Which "Progressives?" More conservatives creating enemies to yell at?) have advocated condoms in africa for quite a while and I've never read that they were limited to "sodomy."
2. Do you have a source for sodomy being the best known vector for HIV transmission in africa? Or was it just a gratuitous reference to sodomy in a different place?
3. Who knew?? Another conservative that just loves to bring up sodomy!
Is this a serious question? If so I could waste some time digging out sermons on the evil of miscegenation and the virtue of segregation (willing to bet our old friend Bob Jones comes up in the top 3 on that google search). Maybe even go find some of St. Ambrose's writings to share... If you need me to do that to prove the point I can, but really do you need someone to do that for you?
I was not specifically talking about Africa. The act of sodomy is the best vector for HIV transmission. It's the reason why there is a HIV epidemic among young gay males (syphilis too).
I was talking about the Catholic Church, not some nutty pastor. The central mission of the Churcg is to provide for the sick and needy. The central mission of the "progressives" is to kill babies and encourage unhealthy lifestyles/behaviors.
I'm adopting your dumbass, right wing radio approach to logic.
The central mission of the Catholic Church in Africa has been to kill babies and encourage unhealthy lifestyles/behaviors.
Catholics are intentionally making sure african babies get aids, because it gets rid of financial liabilities because they die sooner. In America, Catholics are mainly interested in molesting little boys, though. I guess the central catholic mission depends on which continent you're on. Molested any altar boys lately?
See? It's easy. Now tell me more about progressive's central mission, we can both play that game.
I guess because Libs don't think for themselves and can only follow lock-step with what their idols/leaders say, they assume that Repubs can only do the same thing and don't seem to understand that we can support a person or even idolize them while not agreeing with every thought, message or even principle of the individual.
Justin
Justin
