Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This! Brewer, and perhaps Gadson, was much more deserving of the OW award for this tournament that Stieber. But, we all knew going in that all Stieber had to do was finish first to get the award. Same as when Jones got it over Pendleton that year.Originally posted by Old Number Nine:
It should have gone to Brewer. As the 13th seed, he beat the 1, 3, 4 and 12th seeds to finish first. This is the definition of Outstanding. Strieber only beat the 2, 9 and 16th seeds but even if 2, 4, 8, 16; it was what he was expected to do and anything less would have been a surprise.
If whoever votes on these things feel that they have to give out a Outstanding Career award then make one. Call it the Cael Sanderson Award; undefeated 4-xer had a pretty fair career. Give it to a deserving senior and to make it more prestigious, don't give it out every year unless it's deserved. I'd say Strieber deserved that award.
I agree with your top 2.Originally posted by Cowguy:
I would have given it to Brewer. He went through such a tough draw - and flat dominated.
Kyven would have been second.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Originally posted by chasepollard:
This award is often a joke! It should be simple, who scored the most points for their team?
It's not Gadsons fault he didn't back into two Titles by virtue of bad calls. It also isn't his fault that he didn't have his daily routine plastered over the screen every return from commercial break.
IMO, there were literally several dozen Wrestlers there that deserved air time...promote the sport. Steiber is a good promotion though, he scores and keeps action up. But dang, there were tons of guys that scored over 20 points for their teams and poured on the scoring. Show all the cool moves and the reaction from 20k fans! Talk about those guys that hit those moves!
It needed to be a promotion of Wrestling, not a logibear farewell tour.
Good points!Originally posted by Old Number Nine:
Originally posted by chasepollard:
This award is often a joke! It should be simple, who scored the most points for their team?
It's not Gadsons fault he didn't back into two Titles by virtue of bad calls. It also isn't his fault that he didn't have his daily routine plastered over the screen every return from commercial break.
IMO, there were literally several dozen Wrestlers there that deserved air time...promote the sport. Steiber is a good promotion though, he scores and keeps action up. But dang, there were tons of guys that scored over 20 points for their teams and poured on the scoring. Show all the cool moves and the reaction from 20k fans! Talk about those guys that hit those moves!
It needed to be a promotion of Wrestling, not a logibear farewell tour.
1st; Agreed, the meaning of the award has been misplaced.
2nd; I don't hold it against Steiber that he won against Oliver on a bad call, I hold it against Oliver. That match should not have been close and Jordan let it be close; from being tired, psyched out, cutting too much weight.. whatever. His fault as it was theirs when Johny & Johnny were upset. That's why the list of greatness at OSU reads Smith, Hutton, Rosholt, Guerrero, Branch not Smith, Hutton, Thompson, Oliver, Rosholt, Guerrero, Hendricks, Branch. I'm looking forward to seeing Dieringer listed between Hutton and Rosholt.
3rd; I also don't hold it against Stieber that the media latched on to him as their darling.
Finally; The way he handled the final after Port was injured was pure class. He could have easily run up the score at the risk of further injuring Port but he didn't. Very classy, but not OW worthy.
This post was edited on 3/27 8:35 AM by Old Number Nine