Final Adjusted Dual Impact Index presented by the National Collegiate Open

[SetonHallPirate]

Enjoy!

Final Adjusted Dual Impact Index p/b @NCOWrestling

 

[oberebo]

125 placings Adj. dual impact NCAA seeding Flo
1. Nathan Tomasello 6 4 4
2. Zeke Moisey 14 0 18
3. Alan Waters 2 1 1
4. Thomas Gilman 4 6 6
5. Nashon Garrett 1 2 2

6. Connor Youtsey 20 0
7. Eddie Klimara 9 7 10
8. Jordan Conaway 10 11 7

133 placings ADI NCAA Flo
1. Cody Brewer 5 13 9
2. Cory Clark 3 3 2
3. Aaron Schopp 1 9 8
4. C. Dardanes 2 1 1
5. James Gulibon 4 7 5
6.Earl Hall 8 6 7
7.Bradley Taylor 6 2 3
8.Rossi Bruno 12 14 10

141 placings ADI NCAA Flo
1. Logan Stieber 1 1 1
2.Mitchell Port 2 2 2
3. Devin Carter 3 4 3
4. Dean Heil 19 10 16
5. Kevin Jack 0 0 15
6.Chris Mecate 16 11 11
7. Lavion Mayes 5 3 7
8. Anthony Ashnault 9 7 8

149 placings ADI NCAA Flo
1. Drake Houdashelt 2 1 2
2. David Habat 4 3 4
3. Jason Tsirtsis 3 2 1
4. Brandon Sorenson 1 4 3
5. Bryant Clagon 16 15
6. Chris Villalonga 13 5 5
7. Alex Richardson 8 8 10
8. Daniel Neff 0 0 0

157 placings ADI NCAA Flo
1. Isaiah Martinez 1 1 1
2. Brian Realbuto 5 2 3
2. 3.James Green 3 4 4
4. Nick Brascetta 13 0 5
5. Ian Miller 8 7 6
6.Dylan Ness 2 3 2
7.Bryan Murphy 16 11 8
8. Mitch Minotti 10 12 12

165 placings ADI NCAA Flo
1. Alex Dierenger 2 1 1
2.Tyler Walsh 3 6 6
3. Bo Jordan 1 5 3
4. Jackson Morse 8 9 8
5. Nick Sulzer 6 5 4
6. Ethan Ramos 15 15 9
7. Isaac Jordan 4 3 3
8. Jim Wilson 12 10 14

174 placings ADI NCAA Flo
1. Matt Brown 2 2 2
2. Tyler Wilps 5 8 5
3.Robert Kokesh 4 1 1
4. Loigan Storley 7 6 4
5. Kyle Crutchmer 13 12 10
6. Michael Evans 1 3 3
7. Zack Epperly 8 8 8
8. Kufrtis Julson 0 0 0

184 placings ADI NCAA Flo
1.Gabe Dean 1 1 1
2. Nathaniel Brown 3 7 3
3. Victor Avery 16 13 13
4. Blake Stauffer 3 3 5
5. Kenny Courts 21 0 15
6. Hayden Zilmer 6 6 6
7. Willie Miklus 10 7 10
8.Timothy Dudley 8 16 18

197 Placings ADI NCAA Flo
1.Kyven Gadsen 1 3 2
2. Kyle Snyder 3 4 4
3. Morgan Mcintosh 5 2 3
4. Scott Schiller 6 5 5
5. J'den Cox 2 1 1
6. Conner Hartman 10 10 7
7. Nathan Burak 4 6 6
8. Max Huntley 8 8 8

285 Placings ADI NCAA Flo
1. Nick Gwiazdowski 1 1 1
2. Adam Coon 3 6 5
3. Mike McMullan 6 2 2
4.Connor Medbery 4 5 4
5.Bobby Telford 2 3 3
6. James Lawson 8* 6 7
7. Ty Walz 12 10 10
8. Michael Kroells 18 9 13
# ADI actually had Jon Gingrich listed at #8.

I got bored and fatigued about half way through this but I wanted to see how using objective figures as in ADI, 4 coaches as in NCAA and 2or 3 gurus as in Flo would stack up. I certainly have not put pencil to paper but just from my standpoint
Flo may have won this battle with NCAA seeding second and ADI third. This may not be true but is the way I see it and I really have never invested much faith in the index compiled by SHP and it also tends to be confusing. I vote for the polls either Flo,AWN, Intermat etc as opposed to ADI or the NCAA.



.

 

[SetonHallPirate]

More accurate to use my pre-NCAA rankings to evaluate where the AAs finished...number is the pre-NCAA Dual Impact Index (without the same adjustments used in the final rankings), listed in order of placing:

125: 5, 15, 1, 4, 3, 21, 8, 10 (0, 0, 5)
133: 4, 2, 3, 1, 7, 9, 6, 11 (0, 1, 6)
141: 1, 2, 3, 14, 27, 15, 8, 9 (1, 2, 4)
149: 1, 4, 3, 2, 13, 11, 6, 29 (1, 1, 5)
157: 1, 4, 3, 8, 7, 2, 11, 18 (1, 1, 6)
165: 1, 3, 2, 8, 5, 13, 4, 12 (1, 1, 6)
174: 2, 4, 3, 7, 13, 1, 8, 34 (0, 1, 6)
184: 1, 5, 16, 3, 21, 6, 10, 14 (1, 1, 4)
197: 1, 2, 4, 6, 3, 8, 5, 7 (1, 2, 8)
285: 1, 4, 6, 3, 2, 7, 13, 17 (1, 1, 6)

Dual Impact Index: 7 of 10 champs, 11 of 20 finalists, 56 of 80 AAs.
Committee: 6 of 10 champs, 9 of 20 finalists, 54 of 80 AAs
Flo: 5 of 10 champs, 10 of 20 finalists, 57 of 80 AAs

Yeah, Flo beat me on AAs, but the Dual Impact Index beat both the committee and Flo everywhere else.

Part of the reason the DII looks so bad for you is because you're including wrestlers who didn't participate in their qualifiers as if they're ranked, something the committee and Flo does not do, and technically I don't do either.

Is it the adjustments that are the problem? Certainly, we'd agree that winning by fall against a lesser-ranked wrestler shouldn't HURT you, right?

Note: The last part isn't a defense, as much as it is a brainstorm. The adjustments should have taken SOME of the "Iowa bias" out of it. (the "Iowa bias" exists because of their relative lack of lesser-ranked Division I opponents on their schedule)