ADVERTISEMENT

Carly Fiorina

Headhunter

MegaPoke is insane
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
20,309
13,181
113
Stillwater, OK
I just like this women's demeanor, she doesn't dodge questions and I think she's got a grasp of all the issues. Like I said in another post she makes a lot of sense to me.

I know there's this narrative that she failed at HP but she can explain her record better than me and when you look at the numbers she did a heck of a lot better than many other tech companies who have completely vanished.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...ith_carly_fiorina_obamacare_alternatives.html
 
I hope the Republicans can put forth a candidate that people can relate to. Somebody who has actually worked for a living and hasn't spent their life in politics. I like Fiorina as well. This country needs a leader as President, not another career politician.
 
Definitely could support her. Man she would tear that hag, Hillarie's, ass up in debates.

The great thing about her candidacy is she can attack Billary and the "sexist, etc. drivel" shoveled by Hill's goobs can't be used.
 
I like how she handles herself in interviews as she is good with the press. CEO experience is a huge plus. Has gone thru tough times as a CEO. Compelling story.
 
Why will you vote for her?

I know you didn't ask me the question, but I'll answer it. We have eighteen months left to survive the damage inflicted/to be inflicted by this administration on the populace, economy, Constitution, etc. Before this goat-f*ck is over, it won't have anything to do with Carly/any of the GOP candidates as being viable; it will come down to survival of the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imprimis
I like how she handles herself in interviews as she is good with the press. CEO experience is a huge plus. Has gone thru tough times as a CEO. Compelling story.
There are far better choices if CEO is the criteria. There must be other reasons.
 
Just watched her interviewed on Morning Joe. I'd vote for her. Answered the questions, didn't flinch one bit. I like her.
 
I would really like to know what her tax plan is. I don't particularly like Rubio's tax plan but at least he has one.
 
What does she want to get accomplished? Slick Willie handled himself well in interviews and was good with the press.
She wants to dismantle the federal bureaucracy, get rid of burdensome federal regulations, reduce the corporate tax, repatriate over seas corporate money, simplify the federal tax code, secure the boarders and implement a sensible guest worker/immigration policy.

Those are just a few I've heard her talk about.
 
She wants to dismantle the federal bureaucracy, get rid of burdensome federal regulations, reduce the corporate tax, repatriate over seas corporate money, simplify the federal tax code, secure the boarders and implement a sensible guest worker/immigration policy.

Those are just a few I've heard her talk about.
Mitt Romney with a worse track record.
 
Is this the same Morning Joe who was recently told to get his resume in order?
 
Is this remark directed at electability or ability to make decent decisions for the country?

It comes across snarky. Was that your intent?
That everyone will be complaining that Fiorina was a RINO the day after the election. She is Mitt Romney without the successful Olympics, business success, and governorship.

Business conservative from a liberal state.
 
Knew next to nothing about her, before. Like her a great deal now.
 
As an aside, if the candidates for the last 2 Presidential elections for the GOP are considered "RINOs" does that mean the definition of Republican is not what everyone thinks it is? If the definition is the same, then why does the party continue to nominate candidates that don't truly represent it's values?
 
As an aside, if the candidates for the last 2 Presidential elections for the GOP are considered "RINOs" does that mean the definition of Republican is not what everyone thinks it is? If the definition is the same, then why does the party continue to nominate candidates that don't truly represent it's values?

Good point.

More accurately, like Romney, she appears to be an establishment Republican.
 
Who gives a shit, if she can beat Hillary, who cares. Rhino is better than commie, socialist, spank wad, vegan lovin, trans fat hatin, yet pot smokin, pill poppin, mushroom eatin, phuck tard liberal. And if the grass root Tea Party types wont get off their ass to vote for her or whoever gets to nomination, they are wrong as two boys bumpin uglies. We have no more time to be divided to at least change course. The Tea Party bitching session and protest of the establishment cause us 4 more years of pain and damage. I didn't like Romney either but I voted for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AC_Exotic
I voted for Romney too and held my nose.

Once the primary season is over and a candidate has won the nomination, we all have no other choice than to vote for the person who closest resembles our views.

I've never been able to vote for a person that believes on every point the same things I do.
 
I don't have any government experience either. I never even ran for student counsel. I know for sure as a history and political science major, there aint a damn democrat in this that if I debated them with my resume, people would vote for me. Fiorina has much more executive experience than I do and less avenues the lib media can attack. She is not fat, black, has a pennis, or Wilt Chamberlinesque with the hoochies, an Uncle Tom. Why the hell wouldn't any sane conservative not want to vote for whoever we throw out there. The "stand" the "real" conservatives took with Romney, caused the country horrible heartache and pain. If we do it again, we are as stupid and dumb as Bill Maher says we are.
 
Definitely could support her. Man she would tear that hag, Hillarie's, ass up in debates.
If she can't beat Boxer what makes you think she can beat Hillary? Fiorina is an interesting candidate, but this statement clearly ignores past performances by both....
 
That old crone isn't going anywhere -- ya'll move on. Nothing to see. She's screwed up everything she's ever touched. She's spit, polish, piss and wind and nothing more. So she got a good corporate gig -- getting a good job in corporate world isn't exactly a harbinger of greatness.

Hillary will pick her teeth with Carly's bones while coo'ing over her little granddaughter sipping milk from Carly's skull.

Carly = uglier, smarter Palin. Nothing more.
 
DA seriously....who could beat Boxer? What's the re-election rate of incumbents? Something like 91%??? This is a national election where people are looking for someone with executive experience and that can think on their feet, this is not an election to become a senator of another liberal cesspool district.
She WOULD tear that hag up in a debate, but you skipped by that admission, not surprisingly.
I'm saying the lady is one of probably 3 candidates I could support on the right side exactly because she can answer direct questions and get to the point.
What makes you think Hillary can beat her on the national stage? As I've said before I do t think Hillary will even be the nominee, much less president. The idiot president had a 100'x the tailwind hill will ever have and the passes Barry got will not be extended to the grafter Clinton.
 
That old crone isn't going anywhere -- ya'll move on. Nothing to see. She's screwed up everything she's ever touched. She's spit, polish, piss and wind and nothing more. So she got a good corporate gig -- getting a good job in corporate world isn't exactly a harbinger of greatness.

Because being a career first lady and professional liar are harbingers of greatness...
 
DA seriously....who could beat Boxer? What's the re-election rate of incumbents? Something like 91%??? This is a national election where people are looking for someone with executive experience and that can think on their feet, this is not an election to become a senator of another liberal cesspool district.
She WOULD tear that hag up in a debate, but you skipped by that admission, not surprisingly.
I'm saying the lady is one of probably 3 candidates I could support on the right side exactly because she can answer direct questions and get to the point.
What makes you think Hillary can beat her on the national stage? As I've said before I do t think Hillary will even be the nominee, much less president. The idiot president had a 100'x the tailwind hill will ever have and the passes Barry got will not be extended to the grafter Clinton.
I'm just talking the debates... Boxer was a disaster in the Senate debates and it was pretty much agreed that they were a toss up.

Sentiment wise I am negative Hillary - slight negative on Carly. Lost at sea without a candidate right now...
 
davidallen, cling onto black mold as a candidate. It's just as reliably bad as Pant Suit Cankle Clinton and much less harmless.
 
Okay DA didn't realize you were talking about just debates....I actually didn't see them at the time so can't vouch for that then. I think now though, CF clearly thinks quicker on her feet and answers the questions as opposed to Hill who wants questions vetted and then ask by campaign event plants.
 
Saw her again last night. Simply answers questions. No pc bulls*^t. Like her.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT